Papers › The PESQetarian: On the Relevance of Goodhart's Law for Speech Enhancement
The PESQetarian: On the Relevance of Goodhart's Law for Speech Enhancement
Danilo de Oliveira, Simon Welker, Julius Richter, Timo Gerkmann
To obtain improved speech enhancement models, researchers often focus on increasing performance according to specific instrumental metrics. However, when the same metric is used in a loss function to optimize models, it may be detrimental to aspects that the given metric does not see. The goal of this paper is to illustrate the risk of overfitting a speech enhancement model to the metric used for evaluation. For this, we introduce enhancement models that exploit the widely used PESQ measure. Our "PESQetarian" model achieves 3.82 PESQ on VB-DMD while scoring very poorly in a listening experiment. While the obtained PESQ value of 3.82 would imply "state-of-the-art" PESQ-performance on the VB-DMD benchmark, our examples show that when optimizing w.r.t. a metric, an isolated evaluation on the same metric may be misleading. Instead, other metrics should be included in the evaluation and the resulting performance predictions should be confirmed by listening.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
No code repository is listed for this paper in the archive or in Syntology's graph.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Speech Enhancement | VoiceBank + DEMAND | PESQetarian | CBAK | 2.49 | #2 of 42 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Speech Enhancement | VoiceBank + DEMAND | PESQetarian | COVL | 3.5 | #2 of 42 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Speech Enhancement | VoiceBank + DEMAND | PESQetarian | CSIG | 3.63 | #2 of 42 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Speech Enhancement | VoiceBank + DEMAND | PESQetarian | ESTOI | 0.84 | #2 of 42 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Speech Enhancement | VoiceBank + DEMAND | PESQetarian | PESQ (wb) | 3.82 | #2 of 42 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Speech Enhancement | VoiceBank + DEMAND | PESQetarian | Para. (M) | 30 | #2 of 42 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Speech Enhancement | VoiceBank + DEMAND | PESQetarian | SI-SDR | -19.8 | #2 of 42 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Speech Enhancement | VoiceBank + DEMAND | PESQetarian | SSNR | -2.72 | #2 of 42 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Speech Enhancement | VoiceBank + DEMAND | PESQetarian | STOI | 0.92 | #2 of 42 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections