Papers › The Iron Yield of Normal Type II Supernovae

The Iron Yield of Normal Type II Supernovae

6 May 2021arXiv:2105.03268links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Ó. Rodríguez, N. Meza, J. Pineda-García, M. Ramirez

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

We present ⁵⁶Ni mass estimates for 110 normal Type II supernovae (SNe II), computed here from their luminosity in the radioactive tail. This sample consists of SNe from the literature, with at least three photometric measurements in a single optical band within 95-320 d since explosion. To convert apparent magnitudes to bolometric ones, we compute bolometric corrections (BCs) using 15 SNe in our sample having optical and near-IR photometry, along with three sets of SN II atmosphere models to account for the unobserved flux. We find that the I- and i-band are best suited to estimate luminosities through the BC technique. The ⁵⁶Ni mass distribution of our SN sample has a minimum and maximum of 0.005 and 0.177 M_⊙, respectively, and a selection-bias-corrected average of 0.037±0.005 M_⊙. Using the latter value together with iron isotope ratios of two sets of core-collapse (CC) nucleosynthesis models, we calculate a mean iron yield of 0.040±0.005 M_⊙ for normal SNe II. Combining this result with recent mean ⁵⁶Ni mass measurements for other CC SN subtypes, we estimate a mean iron yield $<$0.068 M_⊙ for CC SNe, where the contribution of normal SNe II is $>$36 per cent. We also find that the empirical relation between $^{56}$Ni mass and steepness parameter (S) is poorly suited to measure the ⁵⁶Ni mass of normal SNe II. Instead, we present a correlation between ⁵⁶Ni mass, S, and absolute magnitude at 50 d since explosion. The latter allows to measure ⁵⁶Ni masses of normal SNe II with a precision around 30 per cent.

PaperPDFCode

Code

olrodrig/SNII_nickel officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections