Papers › How to derive skill from the Fractions Skill Score
How to derive skill from the Fractions Skill Score
Bobby Antonio, Laurence Aitchison
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
The Fractions Skill Score (FSS) is a widely used metric for assessing forecast skill, with applications ranging from precipitation to volcanic ash forecasts. By evaluating the fraction of grid squares exceeding a threshold in a neighbourhood, the intuition is that it can avoid the pitfalls of pixel-wise comparisons and identify length scales at which a forecast has skill. The FSS is typically interpreted relative to a `useful' criterion, where a forecast is considered skillful if its score exceeds a simple reference score. However, the typical reference score used is problematic, as it is not derived in a way that provides obvious meaning or that scales with neighbourhood size, and forecasts that do not exceed it can have considerable skill. We therefore provide a new method to determine forecast skill from the FSS, by deriving an expression for the FSS achieved by a random forecast, which provides a more robust and meaningful reference score to compare with. Through illustrative examples we show that this new method considerably changes the length scales at which a forecast would be regarded as skillful, and reveals subtleties in how the FSS should be interpreted.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections