Papers › The effectiveness of MAE pre-pretraining for billion-scale pretraining

The effectiveness of MAE pre-pretraining for billion-scale pretraining

23 Mar 2023ICCV 2023 1arXiv:2303.13496archive 2025-07-28

Mannat Singh, Quentin Duval, Kalyan Vasudev Alwala, Haoqi Fan, Vaibhav Aggarwal, Aaron Adcock, Armand Joulin, Piotr Dollár, Christoph Feichtenhofer, Ross Girshick, Rohit Girdhar, Ishan Misra

This paper revisits the standard pretrain-then-finetune paradigm used in computer vision for visual recognition tasks. Typically, state-of-the-art foundation models are pretrained using large scale (weakly) supervised datasets with billions of images. We introduce an additional pre-pretraining stage that is simple and uses the self-supervised MAE technique to initialize the model. While MAE has only been shown to scale with the size of models, we find that it scales with the size of the training dataset as well. Thus, our MAE-based pre-pretraining scales with both model and data size making it applicable for training foundation models. Pre-pretraining consistently improves both the model convergence and the downstream transfer performance across a range of model scales (millions to billions of parameters), and dataset sizes (millions to billions of images). We measure the effectiveness of pre-pretraining on 10 different visual recognition tasks spanning image classification, video recognition, object detection, low-shot classification and zero-shot recognition. Our largest model achieves new state-of-the-art results on iNaturalist-18 (91.7%), ImageNet-ReaL (91.1%), 1-shot ImageNet-1k (63.6%), and zero-shot transfer on Food-101 (96.2%). Our study reveals that model initialization plays a significant role, even for web-scale pretraining with billions of images, and our models are available publicly.

PaperPDFConference PDFCode

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

Code

facebookresearch/maws officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorchNOASSERTION report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Action ClassificationAction RecognitionFew-Shot Image ClassificationImage ClassificationObject DetectionVideo ClassificationVideo RecognitionZero-Shot LearningZero-Shot Transfer Image Classificationimage-classification

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Action Recognition Something-Something V2 MAWS (ViT-L) Top-1 Accuracy 74.4 #14 of 123 Archive leaderboard report
Few-Shot Image Classification ImageNet - 1-shot MAWS (ViT-6.5B) Top 1 Accuracy 63.6 #2 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Few-Shot Image Classification ImageNet - 1-shot MAWS (ViT-2B) Top 1 Accuracy 62.1 #7 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Few-Shot Image Classification ImageNet - 1-shot MAWS (ViT-H) Top 1 Accuracy 57.1 #8 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Few-Shot Image Classification ImageNet - 10-shot MAWS (ViT-6.5B) Top 1 Accuracy 84.6 #1 of 7 Archive leaderboard report
Few-Shot Image Classification ImageNet - 10-shot MAWS (ViT-2B) Top 1 Accuracy 83.7 #3 of 7 Archive leaderboard report
Few-Shot Image Classification ImageNet - 10-shot MAWS (ViT-H) Top 1 Accuracy 82.5 #4 of 7 Archive leaderboard report
Few-Shot Image Classification ImageNet - 5-shot MAWS (ViT-6.5B) Top 1 Accuracy 82.6 #2 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Few-Shot Image Classification ImageNet - 5-shot MAWS (ViT-2B) Top 1 Accuracy 81.5 #3 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Few-Shot Image Classification ImageNet - 5-shot MAWS (ViT-H) Top 1 Accuracy 79.8 #4 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Few-Shot Image Classification iNaturalist 2018 - 1-shot MAWS (ViT-2B) Top 1 Accuracy 35.5 #1 of 1 Archive leaderboard report
Few-Shot Image Classification iNaturalist 2018 - 10-shot MAWS (ViT-2B) Top 1 Accuracy 80.3 #1 of 1 Archive leaderboard report
Few-Shot Image Classification iNaturalist 2018 - 5-shot MAWS (ViT-2B) Top 1 Accuracy 72.8 #1 of 1 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet MAWS (ViT-6.5B) Number of params 6500M #8 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet MAWS (ViT-6.5B) Top 1 Accuracy 90.1% #8 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet MAWS (ViT-2B) Number of params 2000M #12 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet MAWS (ViT-2B) Top 1 Accuracy 89.8% #12 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet MAWS (ViT-H) Number of params 650M #19 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet MAWS (ViT-H) Top 1 Accuracy 89.5% #19 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet MAWS (ViT-L) Top 1 Accuracy 88.8% #30 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet MAWS (ViT-B) Top 1 Accuracy 86.8% #121 of 1060 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet ReaL MAWS (ViT-6.5B) Accuracy 91.1% #5 of 57 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet ReaL MAWS (ViT-2B) Accuracy 90.9% #9 of 57 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet ReaL MAWS (ViT-H) Accuracy 90.8% #12 of 57 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet V2 MAWS (ViT-6.5B) Top 1 Accuracy 84.0 #5 of 33 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ImageNet V2 MAWS (ViT-2B) Top 1 Accuracy 83.0 #7 of 33 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ObjectNet MAWS (ViT-6.5B) Top-1 Accuracy 77.9 #7 of 106 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ObjectNet MAWS (ViT-2B) Top-1 Accuracy 75.8 #8 of 106 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification ObjectNet MAWS (ViT-H) Top-1 Accuracy 72.6 #9 of 106 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification iNaturalist 2018 MAWS (ViT-2B) Top-1 Accuracy 91.3% #4 of 60 Archive leaderboard report
Zero-Shot Transfer Image Classification Food-101 MAWS (ViT-2B) Top 1 Accuracy 96.2 #1 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Zero-Shot Transfer Image Classification ImageNet MAWS (ViT-2B) Accuracy (Private) 82.1 #11 of 23 Archive leaderboard report
Zero-Shot Transfer Image Classification ImageNet MAWS (ViT-H) Accuracy (Private) 81.1 #14 of 23 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Methods

MAE

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections