Papers › The Conditioning Bias in Binary Decision Trees and Random Forests and Its Elimination

The Conditioning Bias in Binary Decision Trees and Random Forests and Its Elimination

17 Dec 2023arXiv:2312.10708archive 2025-07-28

Gábor Timár, György Kovács

Decision tree and random forest classification and regression are some of the most widely used in machine learning approaches. Binary decision tree implementations commonly use conditioning in the form 'feature ≤ (or <) threshold', with the threshold being the midpoint between two observed feature values. In this paper, we investigate the bias introduced by the choice of conditioning operator (an intrinsic property of implementations) in the presence of features with lattice characteristics. We propose techniques to eliminate this bias, requiring an additional prediction with decision trees and incurring no cost for random forests. Using 20 classification and 20 regression datasets, we demonstrate that the bias can lead to statistically significant differences in terms of AUC and r² scores. The proposed techniques successfully mitigate the bias, compared to the worst-case scenario, statistically significant improvements of up to 0.1-0.2 percentage points of AUC and r² scores were achieved and the improvement of 1.5 percentage points of r² score was measured in the most sensitive case of random forest regression. The implementation of the study is available on GitHub at the following repository: \url{https://github.com/gykovacs/conditioning_bias}.

PaperPDFCode

Code

gykovacs/conditioning_bias officialmentioned in paper report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

regression

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections