Papers › The Channel Capacity of Channelrhodopsin and Other Intensity-Driven Signal...
The Channel Capacity of Channelrhodopsin and Other Intensity-Driven Signal Transduction Receptors
Andrew W. Eckford, Peter J. Thomas
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Biological systems transduce signals from their surroundings through a myriad of pathways. In this paper, we describe signal transduction as a communication system: the signal transduction receptor acts as the receiver in this system, and can be modeled as a finite-state Markov chain with transition rates governed by the input signal. Using this general model, we give the mutual information under IID inputs in discrete time, and obtain the mutual information in the continuous-time limit. We show that the mutual information has a concise closed-form expression with clear physical significance. We also give a sufficient condition under which the Shannon capacity is achieved with IID inputs. We illustrate our results with three examples: the light-gated Channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2) receptor; the ligand-gated nicotinic acetylcholine (ACh) receptor; and the ligand-gated Calmodulin (CaM) receptor. In particular, we show that the IID capacity of the ChR2 receptor is equal to its Shannon capacity. We finally discuss how the results change if only certain properties of each state can be observed, such as whether an ion channel is open or closed.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections