Papers › The ACRV Picking Benchmark (APB): A Robotic Shelf Picking Benchmark to Foster...

The ACRV Picking Benchmark (APB): A Robotic Shelf Picking Benchmark to Foster Reproducible Research

17 Sep 2016arXiv:1609.05258archive 2025-07-28

Jürgen Leitner, Adam W. Tow, Jake E. Dean, Niko Suenderhauf, Joseph W. Durham, Matthew Cooper, Markus Eich, Christopher Lehnert, Ruben Mangels, Christopher Mccool, Peter Kujala, Lachlan Nicholson, Trung Pham, James Sergeant, Liao Wu, Fangyi Zhang, Ben Upcroft, Peter Corke

Robotic challenges like the Amazon Picking Challenge (APC) or the DARPA Challenges are an established and important way to drive scientific progress. They make research comparable on a well-defined benchmark with equal test conditions for all participants. However, such challenge events occur only occasionally, are limited to a small number of contestants, and the test conditions are very difficult to replicate after the main event. We present a new physical benchmark challenge for robotic picking: the ACRV Picking Benchmark (APB). Designed to be reproducible, it consists of a set of 42 common objects, a widely available shelf, and exact guidelines for object arrangement using stencils. A well-defined evaluation protocol enables the comparison of \emph{complete} robotic systems -- including perception and manipulation -- instead of sub-systems only. Our paper also describes and reports results achieved by an open baseline system based on a Baxter robot.

PaperPDFCode

Code

amazon-picking-challenge/team_acrv officialmentioned in paper report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections