Papers › The accuracy of mutual potential approximations in simulations of binary asteroids
The accuracy of mutual potential approximations in simulations of binary asteroids
Alex Ho, Margrethe Wold, Mohammad Poursina, John T. Conway
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Simulations of asteroid binaries commonly use mutual gravitational potentials approximated by series expansions, leading to truncation errors, and also preventing correct computations of the forces and torques when the bodies are close. We make of a recently developed method where the mutual potential is calculated with the use of surface integrals and is exact for bodies of ellipsoidal shapes. The solutions produced by the surface integration method are compared with an approach that expands the mutual potential, truncated at second and fourth order. The approximate solutions are generated with the ``General Use Binary Asteroid Simulator'' (gubas). We find that the differences in the forces and torques are the largest when the bodies are nearly touching. These differences can exceed 1000% if the shape of the primary is highly elongated. Long term simulations show more than 100% difference in the dynamics if the bodies are initially close, while the differences are negligible if the bodies are initially far apart. For simulations with two triaxial ellipsoids, the computational efficiency of the surface integral method is comparable to fourth order approximations with gubas, and superior to potentials truncated to order eight or higher.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections