Papers › The Efficacy of Self-Supervised Speech Models for Audio Representations

The Efficacy of Self-Supervised Speech Models for Audio Representations

26 Sep 2022arXiv:2209.12900archive 2025-07-28

Tung-Yu Wu, Chen-An Li, Tzu-Han Lin, Tsu-Yuan Hsu, Hung-Yi Lee

Self-supervised learning (SSL) speech models, which can serve as powerful upstream models to extract meaningful speech representations, have achieved unprecedented success in speech representation learning. However, their effectiveness on non-speech datasets is relatively less explored. In this work, we propose an ensemble framework, with a combination of ensemble techniques, to fuse SSL speech models' embeddings. Extensive experiments on speech and non-speech audio datasets are conducted to investigate the representation abilities of our ensemble method and its single constituent model. Ablation studies are carried out to evaluate the performances of different ensemble techniques, such as feature averaging and concatenation. All experiments are conducted during NeurIPS 2021 HEAR Challenge as a standard evaluation pipeline provided by competition officials. Results demonstrate SSL speech models' strong abilities on various non-speech tasks, while we also note that they fail to deal with fine-grained music tasks, such as pitch classification and note onset detection. In addition, feature ensemble is shown to have great potential on producing more holistic representations, as our proposed framework generally surpasses state-of-the-art SSL speech/audio models and has superior performance on various datasets compared with other teams in HEAR Challenge. Our code is available at https://github.com/tony10101105/HEAR-2021-NeurIPS-Challenge -- NTU-GURA.

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

15 samples harvested; 0 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 15 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 0 of the 15 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from tony10101105/hear-2021-neurips-challenge---ntu-gura. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Tasks

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections