Papers › Testing the QCD formation time with reconstructed parton splittings
Testing the QCD formation time with reconstructed parton splittings
Jasmine Brewer, Wilke van der Schee, Urs Wiedemann
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
In high-energy elementary collisions the space-time ordering of parton branching processes is not accessible experimentally. In contrast, in heavy-ion collisions, parton showers interact with a spatially extended dense medium. This sets a reference length scale with respect to which the space-time ordering may be analysed. Here, we explore the possibility of identifying experimental signatures of the QCD formation time, τ_f, on the level of a single parton splitting. Since heavy flavour offers an additional handle on tracing the propagation of individual quarks through the medium, we focus on the g→cc̅ splitting. Combining adapted versions of the Cambridge-Aachen and FlavourCone jet finding algorithms with grooming techniques, we show how the kinematics of such splittings can be reconstructed with high fidelity using either final state partons or hadrons, and how the formation time distribution of parton splittings can be constructed therefrom. Medium modification leads to a characteristic modification of this τ_f distribution. This effect can be used to construct experimentally-accessible ratios of τ_f distributions, in which the sensitivity of the medium modification to the QCD formation time becomes measurable.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections