Papers › Testing protoplanetary disc evolution with CO fluxes. A proof of concept in Lupus and Upper Sco
Testing protoplanetary disc evolution with CO fluxes. A proof of concept in Lupus and Upper Sco
Francesco Zagaria, Stefano Facchini, Anna Miotello, Carlo F. Manara, Claudia Toci, Cathie J. Clarke
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
The Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) revolutionised our understanding of protoplanetary discs. However, the available data have not given conclusive answers yet on the underlying disc evolution mechanisms (viscosity or MHD winds). Improving upon the current results, mostly based on the analysis of disc sizes, is difficult because larger, deeper and higher angular resolution surveys would be required, which could be prohibitive even for ALMA. In this Letter, we introduce an alternative method to study disc evolution based on ¹²CO fluxes. In fact, fluxes can be readily collected using less time-consuming, lower resolution observations, while tracing the same disc physico-chemical processes as sizes: assuming that ¹²CO is optically thick, fluxes scale with the disc surface area. We developed a semi-analytical model to compute ¹²CO fluxes and benchmarked it against the results of DALI thermochemical models, recovering an agreement within a factor of three. As a proof of concept we compared our models with Lupus and Upper Sco data, taking advantage of the increased samples, by a factor 1.3 (Lupus) and 3.6 (Upper Sco), when studying fluxes instead of sizes. Models and data agree well only if CO depletion is considered. However, the uncertainties on the initial conditions limited our interpretation of the observations. Our new method can be used to design future ad hoc observational strategies to collect better data and give conclusive answers on disc evolution.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections