Papers › Testing Graviton Parity and Gaussianity with Planck T-, E- and B-mode Bispectra

Testing Graviton Parity and Gaussianity with Planck T-, E- and B-mode Bispectra

19 Dec 2023arXiv:2312.12498links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Oliver H. E. Philcox, Maresuke Shiraishi

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

Many inflationary theories predict a non-Gaussian spectrum of primordial tensor perturbations, sourced from non-standard vacuum fluctuations, modified general relativity or new particles such as gauge fields. Several such models also predict a chiral spectrum in which one polarization state dominates. In this work, we place constraints on the non-Gaussianity and parity properties of primordial gravitational waves utilizing the Planck PR4 temperature and polarization dataset. Using recently developed quasi-optimal bispectrum estimators, we compute binned parity-even and parity-odd bispectra for all combinations of CMB T-, E- and B-modes with 2≤ℓ<500, and perform both blind tests, sensitive to arbitrary three-point functions, and targeted analyses of a well-motivated equilateral gravitational wave template (sourced by gauge fields), with amplitude f_(NL)ᵗᵗᵗ. This is the first time B-modes have been included in primordial non-Gaussianity analyses; they are found to strengthen constraints on the parity-even sector by ≃30% and dominate the parity-odd bounds, without inducing bias. We report no detection of non-Gaussianity (of either parity), with the template amplitude constrained to f_(NL)ᵗᵗᵗ=900±700 (stable with respect to a number of analysis variations), compared to 1300±1200 in Planck 2018. The methods applied herein can be reapplied to upcoming CMB datasets such as LiteBIRD, with the inclusion of B-modes poised to dramatically improve future bounds on tensor non-Gaussianity.

PaperPDFCode

Code

oliverphilcox/polybin officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections