Papers › Tensor Programs V: Tuning Large Neural Networks via Zero-Shot Hyperparameter Transfer

Tensor Programs V: Tuning Large Neural Networks via Zero-Shot Hyperparameter Transfer

7 Mar 2022arXiv:2203.03466archive 2025-07-28

Greg Yang, Edward J. Hu, Igor Babuschkin, Szymon Sidor, Xiaodong Liu, David Farhi, Nick Ryder, Jakub Pachocki, Weizhu Chen, Jianfeng Gao

Hyperparameter (HP) tuning in deep learning is an expensive process, prohibitively so for neural networks (NNs) with billions of parameters. We show that, in the recently discovered Maximal Update Parametrization (muP), many optimal HPs remain stable even as model size changes. This leads to a new HP tuning paradigm we call muTransfer: parametrize the target model in muP, tune the HP indirectly on a smaller model, and zero-shot transfer them to the full-sized model, i.e., without directly tuning the latter at all. We verify muTransfer on Transformer and ResNet. For example, 1) by transferring pretraining HPs from a model of 13M parameters, we outperform published numbers of BERT-large (350M parameters), with a total tuning cost equivalent to pretraining BERT-large once; 2) by transferring from 40M parameters, we outperform published numbers of the 6.7B GPT-3 model, with tuning cost only 7% of total pretraining cost. A Pytorch implementation of our technique can be found at github.com/microsoft/mup and installable via `pip install mup`.

PaperPDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2203.03466")

Code

Syntology Ran 3 of 5 code samples harvested from 4 repositories linked to this paper; 2 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · our draft was wrong; 1 ran · fixture could not drive it; 1 ran with no contract checked.

By repository: official repository: 1 sample from 1 repository, 1 ran; community (archive-listed): 4 samples from 3 repositories, 2 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

microsoft/mup officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorch report
clankur/muGPT mentioned on GitHubjaxBSD-3-Clause report
eleutherai/nanogpt-mup mentioned on GitHubpytorchMIT report
lucaslingle/mu_transformer mentioned on GitHubjax report
vita-group/principled_scaling_lr_init mentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

5 samples harvested; 3 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 2 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

1ran · our draft was wrong
1ran · fixture could not drive it
1ran
2unverified

Licence: 0 of the 5 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from 4 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

constant_std_init_ microsoft/mup/mup/init.py official repository ran · fixture could not drive it MIT (permissive) · 0c4c2c6a29fb9431 · report
TransformerConfig mu-transformer-authors/mu_transformer/mu_transformer/jax_impl/model.py community (archive-listed) ran · metamorphic tier: deterministic Apache-2.0 (permissive) · cc51a0499aef9a80 · report
critic_init_ vita-group/principled_scaling_lr_init/models/utils.py community (archive-listed) ran · our draft was wrong MIT (permissive) · cc4b5a2dc1f8c1e4 · report
_init vita-group/principled_scaling_lr_init/models/utils.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · c8add3cbe90a58e8 · report
get_rel_mup_scaling lucaslingle/mu_transformer/mu_transformer/jax_impl/launch.py community (archive-listed) unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 86cf6316062ec680 · report

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

1x1 ConvolutionAbsolute Position EncodingsAdamAttentionAttention DropoutAverage PoolingBPEBatch NormalizationBottleneck Residual BlockConvolutionCosine AnnealingDense ConnectionsDropoutGPT-3Global Average PoolingKaiming InitializationLabel SmoothingLayer NormalizationLinear LayerLinear Warmup With Cosine AnnealingMax PoolingMulti-Head AttentionPosition-Wise Feed-Forward LayerReLUResidual BlockResidual ConnectionSoftmaxTransformerWeight Decay

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections