Papers › Tell Me Why: Using Question Answering as Distant Supervision for Answer Justification
Tell Me Why: Using Question Answering as Distant Supervision for Answer Justification
Rebecca Sharp, Mihai Surdeanu, Peter Jansen, Marco A. Valenzuela-Esc{\'a}rcega, Peter Clark, Michael Hammond
For many applications of question answering (QA), being able to explain why a given model chose an answer is critical. However, the lack of labeled data for answer justifications makes learning this difficult and expensive. Here we propose an approach that uses answer ranking as distant supervision for learning how to select informative justifications, where justifications serve as inferential connections between the question and the correct answer while often containing little lexical overlap with either. We propose a neural network architecture for QA that reranks answer justifications as an intermediate (and human-interpretable) step in answer selection. Our approach is informed by a set of features designed to combine both learned representations and explicit features to capture the connection between questions, answers, and answer justifications. We show that with this end-to-end approach we are able to significantly improve upon a strong IR baseline in both justification ranking (+9{\%} rated highly relevant) and answer selection (+6{\%} P@1).
Code
No code repository is listed for this paper in the archive or in Syntology's graph.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Question Answering | AI2 Kaggle Dataset | IR Baseline | P@1 | 47.2 | #1 of 4 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Question Answering | AI2 Kaggle Dataset | Our Approach w/o IR | P@1 | 50.54 | #2 of 4 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Question Answering | AI2 Kaggle Dataset | IR++ | P@1 | 50.7 | #3 of 4 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Question Answering | AI2 Kaggle Dataset | OUR APPROACH | P@1 | 54.0 | #4 of 4 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections