Papers › TCP Prague Fall-back on Detection of a Classic ECN AQM

TCP Prague Fall-back on Detection of a Classic ECN AQM

2 Nov 2019arXiv:1911.00710links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Bob Briscoe, Asad Sajjad Ahmed

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

The IETF's Prague L4S Requirements [DSBE20] expect an L4S congestion control to somehow detect if there is a classic ECN [RFB01] AQM at the bottleneck and fall back to Reno-friendly behaviour (as it would on a loss). This paper addresses that requirement in depth. A solution has been implemented in Linux and extensively tested, which distinguishes L4S from Classic AQMs primarily by their delay variation. This paper describes version 2 of the design of that solution, giving extensive rationale and pseudocode. It briefly summarizes a comprehensive testbed evaluation of the solution, referring to the full details online. The v2 algorithm very rarely falsely detects a Classic AQM as L4S. It also rarely detects an L4S AQM as Classic in the majority of scenarios, but not at low link rates and large RTTs. This report is a work in progress. It suggests ideas for improving on the approach. It also outlines new ideas that could solve the problem in complementary or alternative ways.

PaperPDFCode

Code

L4STeam/linux officialmentioned in paper report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Datasets

Introduced by this paper, per the archive.

Classic ECN AQM Fall-Back

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections