Papers › Targeted empirical Bayes for more supervised joint factor analysis

Targeted empirical Bayes for more supervised joint factor analysis

16 May 2025arXiv:2505.11351links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Glenn Palmer, David B. Dunson

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

Joint Bayesian factor models are popular for characterizing relationships between multivariate correlated predictors and a response variable. Standard models assume that all variables, including both the predictors and the response, are conditionally independent given latent factors. In marginalizing out these factors, one obtains a low rank plus diagonal factorization for the joint covariance, which implies a linear regression for the response given the predictors. Although there are many desirable properties of such models, these methods can struggle to identify the signal when the response is not dependent on the dominant principal components in the predictors. To address this problem, we propose estimating the residual variance in the response model with an empirical Bayes procedure that targets predictive performance of the response given the predictors. We illustrate that this can lead to substantial improvements in simulation performance. We are particularly motivated by studies assessing the health effects of environmental exposures and provide an illustrative application to NHANES data.

PaperPDFCode

Code

glennpalmer/teb-far officialmentioned in paper report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections