Papers › TAPIR enables high-throughput estimation and comparison of phylogenetic...

TAPIR enables high-throughput estimation and comparison of phylogenetic informativeness using locus-specific substitution models

6 Feb 2012arXiv:1202.1215links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Brant C. Faircloth, Jonathan Chang, Michael E. Alfaro

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

Massively parallel DNA sequencing techniques are rapidly changing the dynamics of phylogenetic study design by exponentially increasing the discovery of phylogenetically useful loci. This increase in the number of phylogenetic markers potentially provides researchers the opportunity to select subsets of loci best-addressing particular phylogenetic hypotheses based on objective measures of performance over different time scales. Investigators may also want to determine the power of particular phylogenetic markers relative to each other. However, currently available tools are designed to evaluate a small number of markers and are not well-suited to screening hundreds or thousands of candidate loci across the genome. TAPIR is an alternative implementation of Townsend's estimate of phylogenetic informativeness (PI) that enables rapid estimation and summary of PI when applied to data sets containing hundreds to thousands of candidate, phylogenetically informative loci.

PaperPDFCode

Code

faircloth-lab/tapir mentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections