Papers › TabuLa: Harnessing Language Models for Tabular Data Synthesis

TabuLa: Harnessing Language Models for Tabular Data Synthesis

19 Oct 2023arXiv:2310.12746archive 2025-07-28

Zilong Zhao, Robert Birke, Lydia Chen

Tabular data synthesis is crucial for addressing privacy and security concerns in industries reliant on tabular data. While recent advancements adopt large language models (LLMs) for realistic tabular data generation, their long training times and limited reusability hinder practical applications. In this paper, we propose Tabula, a tabular data synthesizer that leverages the structure of LLM. Unlike state-of-the-art (SOTA) LLM-based tabular data synthesizers that rely on pre-trained LLMs, Tabula discards the pre-trained weights originally designed for natural language tasks, focusing instead on a tailored approach for tabular data. In addition, Tabula introduces a token sequence compression strategy that significantly reduces training time while maintaining data quality, alongside a novel token padding method that improves sequence alignment across training batches. Experiments on six datasets show that Tabula achieves superior synthetic data utility compared to current SOTA methods. Additionally, the results demonstrate that Tabula model trained on tabular datasets serves effectively as a foundational model for synthesizing new tabular datasets. Furthermore, the proposed padding method outperforms the conventional left and right padding strategies. Finally, the results highlight that Tabula averagely reduces training time per epoch by 46.2% compared to state-of-the-art LLM approaches while achieving higher data utility. Our code is available at https://github.com/zhao-zilong/Tabula

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

5 samples harvested; 5 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 0 of the 5 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from team-tud/ctab-gan. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Tasks

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections