Papers › T2I-FineEval: Fine-Grained Compositional Metric for Text-to-Image Evaluation

T2I-FineEval: Fine-Grained Compositional Metric for Text-to-Image Evaluation

14 Mar 2025arXiv:2503.11481archive 2025-07-28

Seyed Mohammad Hadi Hosseini, Amir Mohammad Izadi, Ali Abdollahi, Armin Saghafian, Mahdieh Soleymani Baghshah

Although recent text-to-image generative models have achieved impressive performance, they still often struggle with capturing the compositional complexities of prompts including attribute binding, and spatial relationships between different entities. This misalignment is not revealed by common evaluation metrics such as CLIPScore. Recent works have proposed evaluation metrics that utilize Visual Question Answering (VQA) by decomposing prompts into questions about the generated image for more robust compositional evaluation. Although these methods align better with human evaluations, they still fail to fully cover the compositionality within the image. To address this, we propose a novel metric that breaks down images into components, and texts into fine-grained questions about the generated image for evaluation. Our method outperforms previous state-of-the-art metrics, demonstrating its effectiveness in evaluating text-to-image generative models. Code is available at https://github.com/hadi-hosseini/ T2I-FineEval.

PaperPDFCode

Code

hadi-hosseini/t2i-fineeval mentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

AttributeQuestion AnsweringVisual Question AnsweringVisual Question Answering (VQA)

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

ALIGN

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections