Papers › Systematic literature review of the trust reinforcement mechanisms exist in package ecosystems
Systematic literature review of the trust reinforcement mechanisms exist in package ecosystems
Angel Temelko, Fang Hou, Siamak Farshidi, Slinger Jansen
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
We conducted a thorough SLR to better grasp the challenges and possible solutions associated with existing npm security tools. Our goal was to delve into documented experiences and findings. Specifically, we were keen to learn about the motivations behind choosing third-party packages, software engineers' responses to warning messages, and their overall understanding of security issues. The main aim of this review was to pinpoint prevailing trends, methods, and concerns in trust tools for the present npm environment. Furthermore, we sought to understand the complexities of integrating SECO into platforms such as npm. By analyzing earlier studies, our intention was to spot any overlooked areas and steer our research to address them.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections