Papers › Syntactic approaches to opetopes

Syntactic approaches to opetopes

14 Mar 2019arXiv:1903.05848links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Pierre-Louis Curien, Cédric Ho Thanh, Samuel Mimram

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

Opetopes are algebraic descriptions of shapes corresponding to compositions in higher dimensions. As such, they offer an approach to higher-dimensional algebraic structures, and in particular, to the definition of weak ω-categories, which was the original motivation for their introduction by Baez and Dolan. They are classically defined inductively (as free operads in Leinster's approach, or as zoom complexes in the formalism of Kock et al.), using abstract constructions making them difficult to manipulate with a computer. In this paper, we present two purely syntactic descriptions of opetopes as sequent calculi, the first using variables to implement the compositional nature of opetopes, the second using a calculus of higher addresses. We prove that well-typed sequents in both systems are in bijection with opetopes as defined in the more traditional approaches. Additionally, we propose three variants to describe opetopic sets. We expect that the resulting structures can serve as natural foundations for mechanized tools based on opetopes.

PaperPDFCode

Code

altaris/opetopy officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubtf report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections