Papers › Symbolic construction of GR(1) contracts for synchronous systems with full information
Symbolic construction of GR(1) contracts for synchronous systems with full information
Ioannis Filippidis, Richard M. Murray
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
This work proposes a symbolic algorithm for the construction of assume-guarantee specifications that allow multiple agents to cooperate. Each agent is assigned goals expressed in a fragment of linear temporal logic known as generalized reactivity of rank 1 (GR(1)). These goals may be unrealizable, unless additional assumptions are made by each agent about the behavior of the other agents. The proposed algorithm constructs weakly fair assumptions for each agent, to ensure that they can cooperate successfully. A necessary requirement is that the given goals be cooperatively satisfiable. We prove that there exist games for which the GR(1) fragment with liveness properties over states is not sufficient to ensure realizability from any state in the cooperatively winning set. The obstruction is due to circular dependencies of liveness goals. To prevent circularity, we introduce nested games as a formalism to express specifications with conditional assumptions. The algorithm is symbolic, with fixpoint structure similar to the GR(1) synthesis algorithm, implying time complexity polynomial in the number of states, and linear in the number of recurrence goals.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections