Papers › Supporting Custom Instructions with the LLVM Compiler for RISC-V Processor

Supporting Custom Instructions with the LLVM Compiler for RISC-V Processor

23 Oct 2023arXiv:2310.18353links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Eymen Ünay, Bora İnan, Emrecan Yiğit

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

The rise of hardware accelerators with custom instructions necessitates custom compiler backends supporting these accelerators. This study provides detailed analyses of LLVM and its RISC-V backend, supplemented with case studies providing end-to-end overview of the mentioned transformations. We discuss that instruction design should consider both hardware and software design space. The necessary compiler modifications may mean that the instruction is not well designed and need to be reconsidered. We discuss that RISC-V standard extensions provide exemplary instructions that can guide instruction designers. In this study, the process of adding a custom instruction to compiler is split into two parts as Assembler support and pattern matching support. Without pattern matching support, conventional software requires manual entries of inline Assembly for the accelerator which is not scalable. While it is trivial to add Assembler support regardless of the instruction semantics, pattern matching support is on the contrary. Pattern matching support and choosing the right stage for the modification, requires the knowledge of the internal transformations in the compiler. This study delves deep into pattern matching and presents multiple ways to approach the problem of pattern matching support. It is discussed that depending on the pattern's complexity, higher level transformations, e.g. IR level, can be more maintainable compared to Instruction Selection phase.

PaperPDFCode

Code

eymay/senior-design-project officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections