Papers › Successfully Applying Lottery Ticket Hypothesis to Diffusion Model
Successfully Applying Lottery Ticket Hypothesis to Diffusion Model
Chao Jiang, Bo Hui, Bohan Liu, Da Yan
Despite the success of diffusion models, the training and inference of diffusion models are notoriously expensive due to the long chain of the reverse process. In parallel, the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis (LTH) claims that there exists winning tickets (i.e., aproperly pruned sub-network together with original weight initialization) that can achieve performance competitive to the original dense neural network when trained in isolation. In this work, we for the first time apply LTH to diffusion models. We empirically find subnetworks at sparsity 90%-99% without compromising performance for denoising diffusion probabilistic models on benchmarks (CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, MNIST). Moreover, existing LTH works identify the subnetworks with a unified sparsity along different layers. We observe that the similarity between two winning tickets of a model varies from block to block. Specifically, the upstream layers from two winning tickets for a model tend to be more similar than the downstream layers. Therefore, we propose to find the winning ticket with varying sparsity along different layers in the model. Experimental results demonstrate that our method can find sparser sub-models that require less memory for storage and reduce the necessary number of FLOPs. Codes are available at https://github.com/osier0524/Lottery-Ticket-to-DDPM.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections