Papers › Style-Guided Shadow Removal
Style-Guided Shadow Removal
Jin Wan, Hui Yin, Zhenyao Wu, Xinyi Wu, Yanting Liu, Song Wang
Shadow removal is an important topic in image restoration, and it can benefit many computer vision tasks. State-of-the-art shadow-removal methods typically employ deep learning by minimizing a pixel-level difference between the de-shadowed region and their corresponding (pseudo) shadow-free version. After shadow removal, the shadow and non-shadow regions may exhibit inconsistent appearance, leading to a visually disharmonious image. To address this problem, we propose a style-guided shadow removal network (SG-ShadowNet) for better image-style consistency after shadow removal. In SG-ShadowNet, we first learn the style representation of the non-shadow region via a simple region style estimator. Then we propose a novel effective normalization strategy with the region-level style to adjust the coarsely re-covered shadow region to be more harmonized with the rest of the image. Extensive experiments show that our proposed SG-ShadowNet outperforms all the existing competitive models and achieves a new state-of-the-art performance on ISTD+, SRD, and Video Shadow Removal benchmark datasets. Code is available at: https://github.com/jinwan1994/SG-ShadowNet.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shadow Removal | ISTD+ | SG-ShadowNet (ECCV 2022) (512x512) | LPIPS | 0.205 | #5 of 26 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Shadow Removal | ISTD+ | SG-ShadowNet (ECCV 2022) (512x512) | PSNR | 28.25 | #5 of 26 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Shadow Removal | ISTD+ | SG-ShadowNet (ECCV 2022) (512x512) | RMSE | 2.98 | #5 of 26 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Shadow Removal | ISTD+ | SG-ShadowNet (ECCV 2022) (512x512) | SSIM | 0.849 | #5 of 26 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Shadow Removal | ISTD+ | SG-ShadowNet (ECCV 2022) (256x256) | LPIPS | 0.369 | #11 of 26 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Shadow Removal | ISTD+ | SG-ShadowNet (ECCV 2022) (256x256) | PSNR | 26.8 | #11 of 26 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Shadow Removal | ISTD+ | SG-ShadowNet (ECCV 2022) (256x256) | RMSE | 3.32 | #11 of 26 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Shadow Removal | ISTD+ | SG-ShadowNet (ECCV 2022) (256x256) | SSIM | 0.717 | #11 of 26 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Shadow Removal | SRD | SG-ShadowNet (ECCV 2022) (512x512) | LPIPS | 0.279 | #8 of 25 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Shadow Removal | SRD | SG-ShadowNet (ECCV 2022) (512x512) | PSNR | 25.56 | #8 of 25 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Shadow Removal | SRD | SG-ShadowNet (ECCV 2022) (512x512) | RMSE | 4.01 | #8 of 25 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Shadow Removal | SRD | SG-ShadowNet (ECCV 2022) (512x512) | SSIM | 0.786 | #8 of 25 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Shadow Removal | SRD | SG-ShadowNet (ECCV 2022) (256x256) | LPIPS | 0.443 | #17 of 25 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Shadow Removal | SRD | SG-ShadowNet (ECCV 2022) (256x256) | PSNR | 24.1 | #17 of 25 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Shadow Removal | SRD | SG-ShadowNet (ECCV 2022) (256x256) | RMSE | 4.6 | #17 of 25 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Shadow Removal | SRD | SG-ShadowNet (ECCV 2022) (256x256) | SSIM | 0.636 | #17 of 25 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections