Papers › Structured Sparse R-CNN for Direct Scene Graph Generation

Structured Sparse R-CNN for Direct Scene Graph Generation

21 Jun 2021CVPR 2022 1arXiv:2106.10815archive 2025-07-28

Yao Teng, LiMin Wang

Scene graph generation (SGG) is to detect object pairs with their relations in an image. Existing SGG approaches often use multi-stage pipelines to decompose this task into object detection, relation graph construction, and dense or dense-to-sparse relation prediction. Instead, from a perspective on SGG as a direct set prediction, this paper presents a simple, sparse, and unified framework, termed as Structured Sparse R-CNN. The key to our method is a set of learnable triplet queries and a structured triplet detector which could be jointly optimized from the training set in an end-to-end manner. Specifically, the triplet queries encode the general prior for object pairs with their relations, and provide an initial guess of scene graphs for subsequent refinement. The triplet detector presents a cascaded architecture to progressively refine the detected scene graphs with the customized dynamic heads. In addition, to relieve the training difficulty of our method, we propose a relaxed and enhanced training strategy based on knowledge distillation from a Siamese Sparse R-CNN. We perform experiments on several datasets: Visual Genome and Open Images V4/V6, and the results demonstrate that our method achieves the state-of-the-art performance. In addition, we also perform in-depth ablation studies to provide insights on our structured modeling in triplet detector design and training strategies. The code and models are made available at https://github.com/MCG-NJU/Structured-Sparse-RCNN.

PaperPDFConference PDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2106.10815")

Code

Syntology Ran 1 of 1 code samples harvested from 0 repositories linked to this paper; 0 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · our draft was wrong.

By repository: 1 identical to code first harvested elsewhere. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

mcg-nju/structured-sparse-rcnn officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorchNOASSERTION report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

1 sample harvested; 1 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

1ran · our draft was wrong

Licence: 1 of the 1 sample is pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Some samples are identical code Syntology first harvested from another repository; for those, this paper's copy is not located and its licence is not recorded. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

build_roi_relation_head identical code first harvested elsewhere ran · our draft was wrong licence of this copy not recorded · fbc88f9f38569eea · report

Tasks

Graph GenerationKnowledge DistillationObject DetectionRelation PredictionScene Graph Generationgraph constructionobject-detection

1 archive task tag without a task page not shown.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

Knowledge DistillationSparse R-CNN

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections