Papers › Strong Baselines for Neural Semi-supervised Learning under Domain Shift

Strong Baselines for Neural Semi-supervised Learning under Domain Shift

25 Apr 2018ACL 2018 7arXiv:1804.09530archive 2025-07-28

Sebastian Ruder, Barbara Plank

Novel neural models have been proposed in recent years for learning under domain shift. Most models, however, only evaluate on a single task, on proprietary datasets, or compare to weak baselines, which makes comparison of models difficult. In this paper, we re-evaluate classic general-purpose bootstrapping approaches in the context of neural networks under domain shifts vs. recent neural approaches and propose a novel multi-task tri-training method that reduces the time and space complexity of classic tri-training. Extensive experiments on two benchmarks are negative: while our novel method establishes a new state-of-the-art for sentiment analysis, it does not fare consistently the best. More importantly, we arrive at the somewhat surprising conclusion that classic tri-training, with some additions, outperforms the state of the art. We conclude that classic approaches constitute an important and strong baseline.

PaperPDFConference PDFCode

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

Code

bplank/semi-supervised-baselines officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHub report
ambujojha/SemiSupervisedLearning mentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Domain AdaptationMulti-Task LearningPart-Of-Speech TaggingSentiment Analysis

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Sentiment Analysis Multi-Domain Sentiment Dataset Multi-task tri-training Average 79.15 #3 of 6 Archive leaderboard report
Sentiment Analysis Multi-Domain Sentiment Dataset Multi-task tri-training Books 74.86 #3 of 6 Archive leaderboard report
Sentiment Analysis Multi-Domain Sentiment Dataset Multi-task tri-training DVD 78.14 #3 of 6 Archive leaderboard report
Sentiment Analysis Multi-Domain Sentiment Dataset Multi-task tri-training Electronics 81.45 #3 of 6 Archive leaderboard report
Sentiment Analysis Multi-Domain Sentiment Dataset Multi-task tri-training Kitchen 82.14 #3 of 6 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections