Papers › Strategist: Learning Strategic Skills by LLMs via Bi-Level Tree Search

Strategist: Learning Strategic Skills by LLMs via Bi-Level Tree Search

20 Aug 2024arXiv:2408.10635archive 2025-07-28

Jonathan Light, Min Cai, Weiqin Chen, Guanzhi Wang, Xiusi Chen, Wei Cheng, Yisong Yue, Ziniu Hu

In this paper, we propose a new method STRATEGIST that utilizes LLMs to acquire new skills for playing multi-agent games through a self-improvement process. Our method gathers quality feedback through self-play simulations with Monte Carlo tree search and LLM-based reflection, which can then be used to learn high-level strategic skills such as how to evaluate states that guide the low-level execution. We showcase how our method can be used in both action planning and dialogue generation in the context of games, achieving good performance on both tasks. Specifically, we demonstrate that our method can help train agents with better performance than both traditional reinforcement learning-based approaches and other LLM-based skill learning approaches in games including the Game of Pure Strategy (GOPS) and The Resistance: Avalon. STRATEGIST helps bridge the gap between foundation models and symbolic decision-making methods through its bi-level approach, leading to more robust decision-making.

PaperPDFCode

In Syntology View this paper on Syntology: its page in Syntology's graph, with its repositories and citations.

Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

Code

jonathanmli/avalon-llm mentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Decision MakingDialogue Generation

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections