Papers › Stochastic Saddle Point Problems with Decision-Dependent Distributions
Stochastic Saddle Point Problems with Decision-Dependent Distributions
Killian Wood, Emiliano Dall'Anese
This paper focuses on stochastic saddle point problems with decision-dependent distributions. These are problems whose objective is the expected value of a stochastic payoff function and whose data distribution drifts in response to decision variables--a phenomenon represented by a distributional map. A common approach to accommodating distributional shift is to retrain optimal decisions once a new distribution is revealed, or repeated retraining. We introduce the notion of equilibrium points, which are the fixed points of this repeated retraining procedure, and provide sufficient conditions for their existence and uniqueness. To find equilibrium points, we develop deterministic and stochastic primal-dual algorithms and demonstrate their convergence with constant step-size in the former and polynomial decay step-size schedule in the latter. By modeling errors emerging from a stochastic gradient estimator as sub-Weibull random variables, we provide error bounds in expectation and in high probability that hold for each iteration. Without additional knowledge of the distributional map, computing saddle points is intractable. Thus we propose a condition on the distributional map--which we call opposing mixture dominance--that ensures that the objective is strongly-convex-strongly-concave. Finally, we demonstrate that derivative-free algorithms with a single function evaluation are capable of approximating saddle points
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections