Papers › Steganalysis of AI Models LSB Attacks
Steganalysis of AI Models LSB Attacks
Daniel Gilkarov, Ran Dubin
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Artificial intelligence has made significant progress in the last decade, leading to a rise in the popularity of model sharing. The model zoo ecosystem, a repository of pre-trained AI models, has advanced the AI open-source community and opened new avenues for cyber risks. Malicious attackers can exploit shared models to launch cyber-attacks. This work focuses on the steganalysis of injected malicious Least Significant Bit (LSB) steganography into AI models, and it is the first work focusing on AI model attacks. In response to this threat, this paper presents a steganalysis method specifically tailored to detect and mitigate malicious LSB steganography attacks based on supervised and unsupervised AI detection steganalysis methods. Our proposed technique aims to preserve the integrity of shared models, protect user trust, and maintain the momentum of open collaboration within the AI community. In this work, we propose 3 steganalysis methods and open source our code. We found that the success of the steganalysis depends on the LSB attack location. If the attacker decides to exploit the least significant bits in the LSB, the ability to detect the attacks is low. However, if the attack is in the most significant LSB bits, the attack can be detected with almost perfect accuracy.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections