Papers › Statistics of the epoch of reionization (EoR) 21-cm signal -- II. The evolution of the...

Statistics of the epoch of reionization (EoR) 21-cm signal -- II. The evolution of the power spectrum error-covariance

13 Jun 2016arXiv:1606.03874links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Rajesh Mondal, Somnath Bharadwaj, Suman Majumdar

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

The EoR 21-cm signal is expected to become highly non-Gaussian as reionization progresses. This severely affects the error-covariance of the EoR 21-cm power spectrum which is important for predicting the prospects of a detection with ongoing and future experiments. Most earlier works have assumed that the EoR 21-cm signal is a Gaussian random field where (1) the error variance depends only on the power spectrum and the number of Fourier modes in the particular k bin, and (2) the errors in the different k bins are uncorrelated. Here we use an ensemble of simulated 21-cm maps to analyze the error-covariance at various stages of reionization. We find that even at the very early stages of reionization (x̅_(HI) ∼0.9) the error variance significantly exceeds the Gaussian predictions at small length-scales (k > 0.5 Mpc⁻¹) while they are consistent at larger scales. The errors in most k bins (both large and small scales), are however found to be correlated. Considering the later stages (x̅_(HI) = 0.15), the error variance shows an excess in all k bins within k ≥0.1 Mpc⁻¹, and it is around 200 times larger than the Gaussian prediction at k ∼1 Mpc⁻¹. The errors in the different k bins are all also highly correlated, barring the two smallest k bins which are anti-correlated with the other bins. Our results imply that the predictions for different 21-cm experiments based on the Gaussian assumption underestimate the errors, and it is necessary to incorporate the non-Gaussianity for more realistic predictions.

PaperPDFCode

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections