Papers › Stateless or stateful FaaS? I'll take both!
Stateless or stateful FaaS? I'll take both!
Carlo Puliafito, Claudio Cicconetti, Marco Conti, Enzo Mingozzi, Andrea Passarella
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Serverless computing has emerged as a very popular cloud technology, together with its companion Function-as-a-Service (FaaS) programming model enabling invocations of stateless functions from clients. An evolution of serverless is now taking place, shifting it towards the edge of the network and broadening its scope to stateful functions, as well. In this paper we argue that stateless vs. stateful is not a dichotomy of the application per se, but rather a time-varying property of most (if not all) applications, as confirmed by the analysis of real traces collected in a production environment. Based on this observation, we propose a mathematical formulation of a resource allocation problem that jointly encompasses both operation modes, dubbed lambda vs. mu, which can be solved efficiently at run-time by an edge orchestrator. We evaluate the proposed solution via simulation experiments in realistic network and workload conditions, which leads the way to the practical realization of a system where applications can freely adapt their current operation mode and optimize their performance at a minimum cost of operation from the network's perspective.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections