Papers › STAR Loss: Reducing Semantic Ambiguity in Facial Landmark Detection

STAR Loss: Reducing Semantic Ambiguity in Facial Landmark Detection

5 Jun 2023CVPR 2023 1arXiv:2306.02763archive 2025-07-28

Zhenglin Zhou, Huaxia Li, Hong Liu, Nanyang Wang, Gang Yu, Rongrong Ji

Recently, deep learning-based facial landmark detection has achieved significant improvement. However, the semantic ambiguity problem degrades detection performance. Specifically, the semantic ambiguity causes inconsistent annotation and negatively affects the model's convergence, leading to worse accuracy and instability prediction. To solve this problem, we propose a Self-adapTive Ambiguity Reduction (STAR) loss by exploiting the properties of semantic ambiguity. We find that semantic ambiguity results in the anisotropic predicted distribution, which inspires us to use predicted distribution to represent semantic ambiguity. Based on this, we design the STAR loss that measures the anisotropism of the predicted distribution. Compared with the standard regression loss, STAR loss is encouraged to be small when the predicted distribution is anisotropic and thus adaptively mitigates the impact of semantic ambiguity. Moreover, we propose two kinds of eigenvalue restriction methods that could avoid both distribution's abnormal change and the model's premature convergence. Finally, the comprehensive experiments demonstrate that STAR loss outperforms the state-of-the-art methods on three benchmarks, i.e., COFW, 300W, and WFLW, with negligible computation overhead. Code is at https://github.com/ZhenglinZhou/STAR.

PaperPDFConference PDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2306.02763")

Code

Syntology Ran 4 of 4 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 0 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · our draft was wrong; 3 ran with no contract checked.

By repository: official repository: 4 samples from 1 repository, 4 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

zhenglinzhou/star officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

4 samples harvested; 4 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

1ran · our draft was wrong
3ran

Licence: 4 of the 4 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from ZhenglinZhou/STAR. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

STARLoss ZhenglinZhou/STAR/lib/loss/starLoss.py official repository ran · metamorphic tier: deterministic no licence file found · pointer only · 3d5cd766c436c11e · report
SmoothL1Loss ZhenglinZhou/STAR/lib/loss/starLoss.py official repository ran · metamorphic tier: invariant fingerprinted no licence file found · pointer only · 18f933cd26f8dc6f · report
WingLoss ZhenglinZhou/STAR/lib/loss/starLoss.py official repository ran · metamorphic tier: invariant fingerprinted no licence file found · pointer only · 25539617aa20a2b6 · report
expand_two_dimensions_at_end ZhenglinZhou/STAR/lib/loss/starLoss.py official repository ran · our draft was wrong fingerprinted no licence file found · pointer only · 044141f88224c379 · report

Tasks

Face AlignmentFacial Landmark Detection

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Face Alignment 300W STAR NME_inter-ocular (%, Challenge) 4.32 #1 of 48 Archive leaderboard report
Face Alignment 300W STAR NME_inter-ocular (%, Common) 2.52 #1 of 48 Archive leaderboard report
Face Alignment 300W STAR NME_inter-ocular (%, Full) 2.87 #1 of 48 Archive leaderboard report
Face Alignment 300W STAR NME_inter-pupil (%, Challenge) 6.22 #1 of 48 Archive leaderboard report
Face Alignment 300W STAR NME_inter-pupil (%, Common) 3.5 #1 of 48 Archive leaderboard report
Face Alignment 300W STAR NME_inter-pupil (%, Full) 4.03 #1 of 48 Archive leaderboard report
Face Alignment COFW STAR NME (inter-ocular) 3.21% #6 of 28 Archive leaderboard report
Face Alignment COFW STAR NME (inter-pupil) 4.62 #6 of 28 Archive leaderboard report
Face Alignment WFLW STAR AUC@10 (inter-ocular) 60.5 #3 of 36 Archive leaderboard report
Face Alignment WFLW STAR FR@10 (inter-ocular) 2.32 #3 of 36 Archive leaderboard report
Face Alignment WFLW STAR NME (inter-ocular) 4.02 #3 of 36 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections