Papers › Stackelberg Game-Theoretic Learning for Collaborative Assembly Task Planning
Stackelberg Game-Theoretic Learning for Collaborative Assembly Task Planning
Yuhan Zhao, Lan Shi, Quanyan Zhu
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
As assembly tasks grow in complexity, collaboration among multiple robots becomes essential for task completion. However, centralized task planning has become inadequate for adapting to the increasing intelligence and versatility of robots, along with rising customized orders. There is a need for efficient and automated planning mechanisms capable of coordinating diverse robots for collaborative assembly. To this end, we propose a Stackelberg game-theoretic learning approach. By leveraging Stackelberg games, we characterize robot collaboration through leader-follower interaction to enhance strategy seeking and ensure task completion. To enhance applicability across tasks, we introduce a novel multi-agent learning algorithm: Stackelberg double deep Q-learning, which facilitates automated assembly strategy seeking and multi-robot coordination. Our approach is validated through simulated assembly tasks. Comparison with three alternative multi-agent learning methods shows that our approach achieves the shortest task completion time for tasks. Furthermore, our approach exhibits robustness against both accidental and deliberate environmental perturbations.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections