Papers › Stacked Conditional Generative Adversarial Networks for Jointly Learning Shadow...

Stacked Conditional Generative Adversarial Networks for Jointly Learning Shadow Detection and Shadow Removal

7 Dec 2017CVPR 2018 6arXiv:1712.02478archive 2025-07-28

Jifeng Wang, Xiang Li, Le Hui, Jian Yang

Understanding shadows from a single image spontaneously derives into two types of task in previous studies, containing shadow detection and shadow removal. In this paper, we present a multi-task perspective, which is not embraced by any existing work, to jointly learn both detection and removal in an end-to-end fashion that aims at enjoying the mutually improved benefits from each other. Our framework is based on a novel STacked Conditional Generative Adversarial Network (ST-CGAN), which is composed of two stacked CGANs, each with a generator and a discriminator. Specifically, a shadow image is fed into the first generator which produces a shadow detection mask. That shadow image, concatenated with its predicted mask, goes through the second generator in order to recover its shadow-free image consequently. In addition, the two corresponding discriminators are very likely to model higher level relationships and global scene characteristics for the detected shadow region and reconstruction via removing shadows, respectively. More importantly, for multi-task learning, our design of stacked paradigm provides a novel view which is notably different from the commonly used one as the multi-branch version. To fully evaluate the performance of our proposed framework, we construct the first large-scale benchmark with 1870 image triplets (shadow image, shadow mask image, and shadow-free image) under 135 scenes. Extensive experimental results consistently show the advantages of ST-CGAN over several representative state-of-the-art methods on two large-scale publicly available datasets and our newly released one.

PaperPDFConference PDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="1712.02478")

Code

Syntology Ran 1 of 1 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 0 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · our draft was wrong.

By repository: community (archive-listed): 1 sample from 1 repository, 1 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

Param-Raval/ipro mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
Param-Raval/shadow-sight mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
jiaruixu/st-cgan mentioned on GitHubpytorch report
kjybinp/SCGAN mentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

1 sample harvested; 1 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

1ran · our draft was wrong

Licence: 1 of the 1 sample is pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from IsHYuhi/ST-CGAN_Stacked_Conditional_Generative_Adversarial_Networks. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

weights_init IsHYuhi/ST-CGAN_Stacked_Conditional_Generative_Adversarial_Networks/models/ST_CGAN.py community (archive-listed) ran · our draft was wrong no licence file found · pointer only · 96c6be3581e1f391 · report

Tasks

Multi-Task LearningShadow DetectionShadow Removal

1 archive task tag without a task page not shown.

Datasets

Introduced by this paper, per the archive.

ISTD

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
RGB Salient Object Detection ISTD JDR Balanced Error Rate 7.35 #3 of 7 Archive leaderboard report
RGB Salient Object Detection SBU / SBU-Refine JDR Balanced Error Rate 8.14 #6 of 7 Archive leaderboard report
RGB Salient Object Detection UCF JDR Balanced Error Rate 11.23 #6 of 7 Archive leaderboard report
Shadow Removal ISTD ST-CGAN MAE 7.47 #9 of 10 Archive leaderboard report
Shadow Removal ISTD+ ST-CGAN (CVPR 2018) (512x512) LPIPS 0.252 #13 of 26 Archive leaderboard report
Shadow Removal ISTD+ ST-CGAN (CVPR 2018) (512x512) PSNR 27.32 #13 of 26 Archive leaderboard report
Shadow Removal ISTD+ ST-CGAN (CVPR 2018) (512x512) RMSE 3.36 #13 of 26 Archive leaderboard report
Shadow Removal ISTD+ ST-CGAN (CVPR 2018) (512x512) SSIM 0.829 #13 of 26 Archive leaderboard report
Shadow Removal ISTD+ ST-CGAN (CVPR 2018) (256x256) LPIPS 0.408 #24 of 26 Archive leaderboard report
Shadow Removal ISTD+ ST-CGAN (CVPR 2018) (256x256) PSNR 25.74 #24 of 26 Archive leaderboard report
Shadow Removal ISTD+ ST-CGAN (CVPR 2018) (256x256) RMSE 3.77 #24 of 26 Archive leaderboard report
Shadow Removal ISTD+ ST-CGAN (CVPR 2018) (256x256) SSIM 0.691 #24 of 26 Archive leaderboard report
Shadow Removal SRD ST-CGAN (CVPR 2018) (256x256) LPIPS 0.443 #10 of 25 Archive leaderboard report
Shadow Removal SRD ST-CGAN (CVPR 2018) (256x256) PSNR 25.08 #10 of 25 Archive leaderboard report
Shadow Removal SRD ST-CGAN (CVPR 2018) (256x256) RMSE 4.15 #10 of 25 Archive leaderboard report
Shadow Removal SRD ST-CGAN (CVPR 2018) (256x256) SSIM 0.637 #10 of 25 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections