Papers › ST++: Make Self-training Work Better for Semi-supervised Semantic Segmentation

ST++: Make Self-training Work Better for Semi-supervised Semantic Segmentation

9 Jun 2021CVPR 2022 1arXiv:2106.05095archive 2025-07-28

Lihe Yang, Wei Zhuo, Lei Qi, Yinghuan Shi, Yang Gao

Self-training via pseudo labeling is a conventional, simple, and popular pipeline to leverage unlabeled data. In this work, we first construct a strong baseline of self-training (namely ST) for semi-supervised semantic segmentation via injecting strong data augmentations (SDA) on unlabeled images to alleviate overfitting noisy labels as well as decouple similar predictions between the teacher and student. With this simple mechanism, our ST outperforms all existing methods without any bells and whistles, e.g., iterative re-training. Inspired by the impressive results, we thoroughly investigate the SDA and provide some empirical analysis. Nevertheless, incorrect pseudo labels are still prone to accumulate and degrade the performance. To this end, we further propose an advanced self-training framework (namely ST++), that performs selective re-training via prioritizing reliable unlabeled images based on holistic prediction-level stability. Concretely, several model checkpoints are saved in the first stage supervised training, and the discrepancy of their predictions on the unlabeled image serves as a measurement for reliability. Our image-level selection offers holistic contextual information for learning. We demonstrate that it is more suitable for segmentation than common pixel-wise selection. As a result, ST++ further boosts the performance of our ST. Code is available at https://github.com/LiheYoung/ST-PlusPlus.

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

9 samples harvested; 4 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 5 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 0 of the 9 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from LiheYoung/ST-PlusPlus. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Tasks

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections