Papers › Sparse hierarchical interaction learning with epigraphical projection

Sparse hierarchical interaction learning with epigraphical projection

22 May 2017arXiv:1705.07817archive 2025-07-28

Mingyuan Jiu, Nelly Pustelnik, Stefan Janaqi, Mériam Chebre, Lin Qi, Philippe Ricoux

This work focuses on learning optimization problems with quadratical interactions between variables, which go beyond the additive models of traditional linear learning. We investigate more specifically two different methods encountered in the literature to deal with this problem: "hierNet" and structured-sparsity regularization, and study their connections. We propose a primal-dual proximal algorithm based on an epigraphical projection to optimize a general formulation of these learning problems. The experimental setting first highlights the improvement of the proposed procedure compared to state-of-the-art methods based on fast iterative shrinkage-thresholding algorithm (i.e. FISTA) or alternating direction method of multipliers (i.e. ADMM), and then, using the proposed flexible optimization framework, we provide fair comparisons between the different hierarchical penalizations and their improvement over the standard ℓ₁-norm penalization. The experiments are conducted both on synthetic and real data, and they clearly show that the proposed primal-dual proximal algorithm based on epigraphical projection is efficient and effective to solve and investigate the problem of hierarchical interaction learning.

PaperPDFCode

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Additive models

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections