Papers › Sparse Graphs for Belief Propagation Decoding of Polar Codes
Sparse Graphs for Belief Propagation Decoding of Polar Codes
Sebastian Cammerer, Moustafa Ebada, Ahmed Elkelesh, Stephan ten Brink
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
We describe a novel approach to interpret a polar code as a low-density parity-check (LDPC)-like code with an underlying sparse decoding graph. This sparse graph is based on the encoding factor graph of polar codes and is suitable for conventional belief propagation (BP) decoding. We discuss several pruning techniques based on the check node decoder (CND) and variable node decoder (VND) update equations, significantly reducing the size (i.e., decoding complexity) of the parity-check matrix. As a result, iterative polar decoding can then be conducted on a sparse graph, akin to the traditional well-established LDPC decoding, e.g., using a fully parallel sum-product algorithm (SPA). This facilitates the systematic analysis and design of polar codes using the well-established tools known from analyzing LDPC codes. We show that the proposed iterative polar decoder has a negligible performance loss for short-to-intermediate codelengths compared to Arikan's original BP decoder. Finally, the proposed decoder is shown to benefit from both reduced complexity and reduced memory requirements and, thus, is more suitable for hardware implementations.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections