Papers › Sparse and Dense Approaches for the Full-rank Retrieval of Responses for Dialogues

Sparse and Dense Approaches for the Full-rank Retrieval of Responses for Dialogues

22 Apr 2022arXiv:2204.10558archive 2025-07-28

Gustavo Penha, Claudia Hauff

Ranking responses for a given dialogue context is a popular benchmark in which the setup is to re-rank the ground-truth response over a limited set of n responses, where n is typically 10. The predominance of this setup in conversation response ranking has lead to a great deal of attention to building neural re-rankers, while the first-stage retrieval step has been overlooked. Since the correct answer is always available in the candidate list of n responses, this artificial evaluation setup assumes that there is a first-stage retrieval step which is always able to rank the correct response in its top-n list. In this paper we focus on the more realistic task of full-rank retrieval of responses, where n can be up to millions of responses. We investigate both dialogue context and response expansion techniques for sparse retrieval, as well as zero-shot and fine-tuned dense retrieval approaches. Our findings based on three different information-seeking dialogue datasets reveal that a learned response expansion technique is a solid baseline for sparse retrieval. We find the best performing method overall to be dense retrieval with intermediate training, i.e. a step after the language model pre-training where sentence representations are learned, followed by fine-tuning on the target conversational data. We also investigate the intriguing phenomena that harder negatives sampling techniques lead to worse results for the fine-tuned dense retrieval models. The code and datasets are available at https://github.com/Guzpenha/transformer_rankers/tree/full_rank_retrieval_dialogues.

PaperPDFCode

Code

Guzpenha/transformer_rankers officialmentioned in paperpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Language ModellingRetrievalSentence

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections