Papers › Space-Time-Separable Graph Convolutional Network for Pose Forecasting

Space-Time-Separable Graph Convolutional Network for Pose Forecasting

9 Oct 2021ICCV 2021 10arXiv:2110.04573archive 2025-07-28

Theodoros Sofianos, Alessio Sampieri, Luca Franco, Fabio Galasso

Human pose forecasting is a complex structured-data sequence-modelling task, which has received increasing attention, also due to numerous potential applications. Research has mainly addressed the temporal dimension as time series and the interaction of human body joints with a kinematic tree or by a graph. This has decoupled the two aspects and leveraged progress from the relevant fields, but it has also limited the understanding of the complex structural joint spatio-temporal dynamics of the human pose. Here we propose a novel Space-Time-Separable Graph Convolutional Network (STS-GCN) for pose forecasting. For the first time, STS-GCN models the human pose dynamics only with a graph convolutional network (GCN), including the temporal evolution and the spatial joint interaction within a single-graph framework, which allows the cross-talk of motion and spatial correlations. Concurrently, STS-GCN is the first space-time-separable GCN: the space-time graph connectivity is factored into space and time affinity matrices, which bottlenecks the space-time cross-talk, while enabling full joint-joint and time-time correlations. Both affinity matrices are learnt end-to-end, which results in connections substantially deviating from the standard kinematic tree and the linear-time time series. In experimental evaluation on three complex, recent and large-scale benchmarks, Human3.6M [Ionescu et al. TPAMI'14], AMASS [Mahmood et al. ICCV'19] and 3DPW [Von Marcard et al. ECCV'18], STS-GCN outperforms the state-of-the-art, surpassing the current best technique [Mao et al. ECCV'20] by over 32% in average at the most difficult long-term predictions, while only requiring 1.7% of its parameters. We explain the results qualitatively and illustrate the graph interactions by the factored joint-joint and time-time learnt graph connections. Our source code is available at: https://github.com/FraLuca/STSGCN

PaperPDFConference PDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2110.04573")

Code

Syntology Ran 2 of 3 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 1 has no recorded run. Of those that ran: 2 ran with no contract checked.

By repository: official repository: 3 samples from 1 repository, 2 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

fraluca/stsgcn officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

3 samples harvested; 2 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 1 has no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

2ran
1unverified

Licence: 0 of the 3 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from fraluca/stsgcn. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

ConvTemporalGraphical fraluca/stsgcn/model.py official repository ran MIT (permissive) · 5e1478060482511c · report
ST_GCNN_layer fraluca/stsgcn/model.py official repository ran MIT (permissive) · cfae10a6f0a4a056 · report
Model fraluca/stsgcn/model.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · c88113ad3c3b9424 · report

Tasks

Human Pose ForecastingSTSTime SeriesTime Series Analysis

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Human Pose Forecasting 3DPW STS-GCN Average MPJPE (mm) 1000 msec 42.3 #1 of 7 Archive leaderboard report
Human Pose Forecasting AMASS STS-GCN Average MPJPE (mm) 1000 msec 45.5 #1 of 11 Archive leaderboard report
Human Pose Forecasting HARPER STS-GCN Average MPJPE (mm) @ 1000ms 171 #3 of 3 Archive leaderboard report
Human Pose Forecasting HARPER STS-GCN Average MPJPE (mm) @ 400ms 120 #3 of 3 Archive leaderboard report
Human Pose Forecasting HARPER STS-GCN Last Frame MPJPE (mm) @ 1000ms 260 #3 of 3 Archive leaderboard report
Human Pose Forecasting HARPER STS-GCN Last Frame MPJPE (mm) @ 400ms 147 #3 of 3 Archive leaderboard report
Human Pose Forecasting Human3.6M STS-GCN Average MPJPE (mm) @ 1000 ms 117.0 #15 of 33 Archive leaderboard report
Human Pose Forecasting Human3.6M STS-GCN Average MPJPE (mm) @ 400ms 65.8 #15 of 33 Archive leaderboard report
Human Pose Forecasting Human3.6M STS-GCN MAR, walking, 1,000ms 0.87 #15 of 33 Archive leaderboard report
Human Pose Forecasting Human3.6M STS-GCN MAR, walking, 400ms 0.55 #15 of 33 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Methods

GCN

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections