Papers › Human-centered Benchmarking for Socially-compliant Robot Navigation
Human-centered Benchmarking for Socially-compliant Robot Navigation
Iaroslav Okunevich, Vincent Hilaire, Stephane Galland, Olivier Lamotte, Liubov Shilova, Yassine Ruichek, Zhi Yan
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Social compatibility is one of the most important parameters for service robots. It characterizes the quality of interaction between a robot and a human. In this paper, a human-centered benchmarking framework is proposed for socially-compliant robot navigation. In an end-to-end manner, four open-source robot navigation methods are benchmarked, two of which are socially-compliant. All aspects of the benchmarking are clarified to ensure the reproducibility and replicability of the experiments. The social compatibility of robot navigation methods with the Robotic Social Attributes Scale (RoSAS) is measured. After that, the correspondence between RoSAS and the robot-centered metrics is validated. Based on experiments, the extra robot time ratio and the extra distance ratio are the most suitable to judge social compatibility.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections