Papers › Soft Labels for Ordinal Regression
Soft Labels for Ordinal Regression
Raul Diaz, Amit Marathe
Ordinal regression attempts to solve classification problems in which categories are not independent, but rather follow a natural order. It is crucial to classify each class correctly while learning adequate interclass ordinal relationships. We present a simple and effective method that constrains these relationships among categories by seamlessly incorporating metric penalties into ground truth label representations. This encoding allows deep neural networks to automatically learn intraclass and interclass relationships without any explicit modification of the network architecture. Our method converts data labels into soft probability distributions that pair well with common categorical loss functions such as cross-entropy. We show that this approach is effective by using off-the-shelf classification and segmentation networks in four wildly different scenarios: image quality ranking, age estimation, horizon line regression, and monocular depth estimation. We demonstrate that our general-purpose method is very competitive with respect to specialized approaches, and adapts well to a variety of different network architectures and metrics.
Code
No code repository is listed for this paper in the archive or in Syntology's graph.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aesthetics Quality Assessment | Image Aesthetics dataset | SORD | Accuracy | 72.03 | #3 of 4 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Aesthetics Quality Assessment | Image Aesthetics dataset | SORD | MAE | 0.290 | #3 of 4 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Age Estimation | Adience | SORD | Accuracy | 59.6 | #3 of 5 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Age Estimation | Adience | SORD | MAE | 0.49 | #3 of 5 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections