Papers › Social Graph Restoration via Random Walk Sampling

Social Graph Restoration via Random Walk Sampling

23 Nov 2021arXiv:2111.11966links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Kazuki Nakajima, Kazuyuki Shudo

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

Analyzing social graphs with limited data access is challenging for third-party researchers. To address this challenge, a number of algorithms that estimate structural properties via a random walk have been developed. However, most existing algorithms are limited to the estimation of local structural properties. Here we propose a method for restoring the original social graph from the small sample obtained by a random walk. The proposed method generates a graph that preserves the estimates of local structural properties and the structure of the subgraph sampled by a random walk. We compare the proposed method with subgraph sampling using a crawling method and the existing method for generating a graph that structurally resembles the original graph via a random walk. Our experimental results show that the proposed method more accurately reproduces the local and global structural properties on average and the visual representation of the original graph than the compared methods. We expect that our method will lead to exhaustive analyses of social graphs with limited data access.

PaperPDFCode

Code

kazuibasou/social-graph-restoration officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections