Papers › snpQT: flexible, reproducible, and comprehensive quality control and imputation of genomic data

snpQT: flexible, reproducible, and comprehensive quality control and imputation of genomic data

5 May 2021arXiv:2105.01923archive 2025-07-28

Christina Vasilopoulou, Benjamin Wingfield, Andrew P. Morris, William Duddy

Motivation: Quality control of genomic data is an essential but complicated multi-step procedure, often requiring separate installation and expert familiarity with a combination of disparate bioinformatics tools. Results: To provide an automated solution that retains comprehensive quality checks and flexible workflow architecture, we have developed snpQT, a scalable, stand-alone software pipeline, offering some 36 discrete quality filters or correction steps, with plots before-and-after user-modifiable thresholding. This includes build conversion, population stratification against 1,000 Genomes data, population outlier removal, and built-in imputation with its own pre- and post- quality controls. Common input formats are used and users need not be superusers nor have any prior coding experience. A comprehensive online tutorial and installation guide is provided through to GWAS (https://snpqt.readthedocs.io/en/latest/), introducing snpQT using a synthetic demonstration dataset and a real-world Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis SNP-array dataset. Availability: snpQT is open source and freely available at https://github.com/nebfield/snpQT Contact: Vasilopoulou-C@ulster.ac.uk, w.duddy@ulster.ac.uk

PaperPDFCode

Code

nebfield/snpQT officialmentioned in paper report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Imputation

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections