Papers › Snap-and-tune: combining deep learning and test-time optimization for high-fidelity...

Snap-and-tune: combining deep learning and test-time optimization for high-fidelity cardiovascular volumetric meshing

9 Jun 2025arXiv:2506.08280archive 2025-07-28

Daniel H. Pak, Shubh Thaker, Kyle Baylous, Xiaoran Zhang, Danny Bluestein, James S. Duncan

High-quality volumetric meshing from medical images is a key bottleneck for physics-based simulations in personalized medicine. For volumetric meshing of complex medical structures, recent studies have often utilized deep learning (DL)-based template deformation approaches to enable fast test-time generation with high spatial accuracy. However, these approaches still exhibit limitations, such as limited flexibility at high-curvature areas and unrealistic inter-part distances. In this study, we introduce a simple yet effective snap-and-tune strategy that sequentially applies DL and test-time optimization, which combines fast initial shape fitting with more detailed sample-specific mesh corrections. Our method provides significant improvements in both spatial accuracy and mesh quality, while being fully automated and requiring no additional training labels. Finally, we demonstrate the versatility and usefulness of our newly generated meshes via solid mechanics simulations in two different software platforms. Our code is available at https://github.com/danpak94/Deep-Cardiac-Volumetric-Mesh.

PaperPDFCode

Code

danpak94/deep-cardiac-volumetric-mesh officialmentioned in paperpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections