Papers › Snakes and Ladders: Adapting the surface code to defects

Snakes and Ladders: Adapting the surface code to defects

16 Dec 2024arXiv:2412.11504links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Catherine Leroux, Sophia F. Lin, Przemyslaw Bienias, Krishanu R. Sankar, Asmae Benhemou, Aleksander Kubica, Joseph K. Iverson

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

One of the critical challenges solid-state quantum processors face is the presence of fabrication imperfections and two-level systems, which render certain qubits and gates either inoperable or much noisier than tolerable by quantum error correction protocols. To address this challenge, we develop a suite of novel and highly performant methods for adapting surface code patches in the presence of defective qubits and gates, which we call \emph{Snakes and Ladders}. We explain how our algorithm generates and compares several strategies in order to find the optimal one for any given configuration of defective components, as well as introduce heuristics to improve runtime and minimize computing resources required by our algorithm. In addition to memory storage we also show how to apply our methods to lattice surgery protocols. Compared to prior works, our methods significantly improve the code distance of the adapted surface code patches for realistic defect rates, resulting in a logical performance similar to that of the defect-free patches.

PaperPDFCode

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections