Papers › Snakes and Ladders: a Treewidth Story

Snakes and Ladders: a Treewidth Story

21 Feb 2023arXiv:2302.10662links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Steven Chaplick, Steven Kelk, Ruben Meuwese, Matus Mihalak, Georgios Stamoulis

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

Let G be an undirected graph. We say that G contains a ladder of length k if the 2 ×(k+1) grid graph is an induced subgraph of G that is only connected to the rest of G via its four cornerpoints. We prove that if all the ladders contained in G are reduced to length 4, the treewidth remains unchanged (and that this bound is tight). Our result indicates that, when computing the treewidth of a graph, long ladders can simply be reduced, and that minimal forbidden minors for bounded treewidth graphs cannot contain long ladders. Our result also settles an open problem from algorithmic phylogenetics: the common chain reduction rule, used to simplify the comparison of two evolutionary trees, is treewidth-preserving in the display graph of the two trees.

PaperPDFCode

Code

skelk2001/snakes_and_ladders officialmentioned in paper report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections