Papers › SmoothOut: Smoothing Out Sharp Minima to Improve Generalization in Deep Learning

SmoothOut: Smoothing Out Sharp Minima to Improve Generalization in Deep Learning

21 May 2018arXiv:1805.07898archive 2025-07-28

Wei Wen, Yandan Wang, Feng Yan, Cong Xu, Chunpeng Wu, Yiran Chen, Hai Li

In Deep Learning, Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) is usually selected as a training method because of its efficiency; however, recently, a problem in SGD gains research interest: sharp minima in Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) have poor generalization; especially, large-batch SGD tends to converge to sharp minima. It becomes an open question whether escaping sharp minima can improve the generalization. To answer this question, we propose SmoothOut framework to smooth out sharp minima in DNNs and thereby improve generalization. In a nutshell, SmoothOut perturbs multiple copies of the DNN by noise injection and averages these copies. Injecting noises to SGD is widely used in the literature, but SmoothOut differs in lots of ways: (1) a de-noising process is applied before parameter updating; (2) noise strength is adapted to filter norm; (3) an alternative interpretation on the advantage of noise injection, from the perspective of sharpness and generalization; (4) usage of uniform noise instead of Gaussian noise. We prove that SmoothOut can eliminate sharp minima. Training multiple DNN copies is inefficient, we further propose an unbiased stochastic SmoothOut which only introduces the overhead of noise injecting and de-noising per batch. An adaptive variant of SmoothOut, AdaSmoothOut, is also proposed to improve generalization. In a variety of experiments, SmoothOut and AdaSmoothOut consistently improve generalization in both small-batch and large-batch training on the top of state-of-the-art solutions.

PaperPDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="1805.07898")

Code

Syntology Ran 0 of 1 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 1 has no recorded run.

By repository: official repository: 1 sample from 1 repository, 0 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

wenwei202/smoothout officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorchMIT report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

1 sample harvested; 0 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 1 has no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

1unverified

Licence: 0 of the 1 sample are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from wenwei202/smoothout. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

get_dataset wenwei202/smoothout/data.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · c02e8307733c548e · report

Tasks

Deep LearningOpen-Ended Question Answering

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

SGD

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections