Papers › Smoothing for age-period-cohort models: a comparison between splines and random process
Smoothing for age-period-cohort models: a comparison between splines and random process
Connor Gascoigne, Theresa Smith, Andrea Riebler
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Age-Period-Cohort (APC) models are well used in the context of modelling health and demographic data to produce smooth estimates of each time trend. When smoothing in the context of APC models, there are two main schools, frequentist using penalised smoothing splines, and Bayesian using random processes with little crossover between them. In this article, we clearly lay out the theoretical link between the two schools, provide examples using simulated and real data to highlight similarities and difference, and help a general APC user understand potentially inaccessible theory from functional analysis. As intuition suggests, both approaches lead to comparable and almost identical in-sample predictions, but random processes within a Bayesian approach might be beneficial for out-of-sample prediction as the sources of uncertainty are captured in a more complete way.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections