Papers › SLUE: New Benchmark Tasks for Spoken Language Understanding Evaluation on Natural Speech

SLUE: New Benchmark Tasks for Spoken Language Understanding Evaluation on Natural Speech

19 Nov 2021arXiv:2111.10367archive 2025-07-28

Suwon Shon, Ankita Pasad, Felix Wu, Pablo Brusco, Yoav Artzi, Karen Livescu, Kyu J. Han

Progress in speech processing has been facilitated by shared datasets and benchmarks. Historically these have focused on automatic speech recognition (ASR), speaker identification, or other lower-level tasks. Interest has been growing in higher-level spoken language understanding tasks, including using end-to-end models, but there are fewer annotated datasets for such tasks. At the same time, recent work shows the possibility of pre-training generic representations and then fine-tuning for several tasks using relatively little labeled data. We propose to create a suite of benchmark tasks for Spoken Language Understanding Evaluation (SLUE) consisting of limited-size labeled training sets and corresponding evaluation sets. This resource would allow the research community to track progress, evaluate pre-trained representations for higher-level tasks, and study open questions such as the utility of pipeline versus end-to-end approaches. We present the first phase of the SLUE benchmark suite, consisting of named entity recognition, sentiment analysis, and ASR on the corresponding datasets. We focus on naturally produced (not read or synthesized) speech, and freely available datasets. We provide new transcriptions and annotations on subsets of the VoxCeleb and VoxPopuli datasets, evaluation metrics and results for baseline models, and an open-source toolkit to reproduce the baselines and evaluate new models.

PaperPDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2111.10367")

Code

Syntology Ran 0 of 12 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 12 have no recorded run.

By repository: official repository: 12 samples from 1 repository, 0 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

asappresearch/slue-toolkit officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorchMIT report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

12 samples harvested; 0 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 12 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

12unverified

Licence: 0 of the 12 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from asappresearch/slue-toolkit. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

convert asappresearch/slue-toolkit/slue_toolkit/eval/eval_utils_nel.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 0302aff920740fbc · report
eval_ctc_model asappresearch/slue-toolkit/slue_toolkit/eval/eval_w2v.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 3b9788e17612ec5c · report
evaluate asappresearch/slue-toolkit/slue_toolkit/eval/eval_utils_nel.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · c8831cc7145df3ab · report
get_ner_scores asappresearch/slue-toolkit/slue_toolkit/eval/eval_utils_ner.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 7df2656f9761c553 · report
get_ner_stats asappresearch/slue-toolkit/slue_toolkit/eval/eval_utils_ner.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 7f746dc6c2a62bb2 · report
load_dct asappresearch/slue-toolkit/slue_toolkit/generic_utils.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 656dc5c1fcd38ff8 · report
load_json asappresearch/slue-toolkit/slue_toolkit/generic_utils.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 16afefff56a55570 · report
load_pkl asappresearch/slue-toolkit/slue_toolkit/generic_utils.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · e29d3eb7f31a6d05 · report
make_distinct asappresearch/slue-toolkit/slue_toolkit/eval/eval_w2v_ner.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 5b6c17ce2ecdeb80 · report
parse_result asappresearch/slue-toolkit/slue_toolkit/eval/eval_w2v.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 400008f29f6e7364 · report
safe_divide asappresearch/slue-toolkit/slue_toolkit/eval/eval_utils_ner.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 815aaded7a9eae16 · report
undetected_indices asappresearch/slue-toolkit/slue_toolkit/eval/eval_utils_nel.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · c6afd1a15980c103 · report

Tasks

Automatic Speech RecognitionAutomatic Speech Recognition (ASR)Named Entity RecognitionNamed Entity Recognition (NER)Sentiment AnalysisSpeaker IdentificationSpeech RecognitionSpoken Language Understandingnamed-entity-recognitionspeech-recognition

Datasets

Introduced by this paper, per the archive.

SLUE

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Named Entity Recognition (NER) SLUE W2V2-L-LL60K (pipeline approach, uses LM) F1 (%) 69.6 #1 of 13 Archive leaderboard report
Named Entity Recognition (NER) SLUE W2V2-L-LL60K (pipeline approach, uses LM) Text model DeBERTa-L #1 of 13 Archive leaderboard report
Named Entity Recognition (NER) SLUE W2V2-L-LL60K (pipeline approach, uses LM) label-F1 (%) 82.2 #1 of 13 Archive leaderboard report
Named Entity Recognition (NER) SLUE W2V2-B-LS960 (pipeline approach, uses LM) F1 (%) 68.0 #2 of 13 Archive leaderboard report
Named Entity Recognition (NER) SLUE W2V2-B-LS960 (pipeline approach, uses LM) Text model DeBERTa-L #2 of 13 Archive leaderboard report
Named Entity Recognition (NER) SLUE W2V2-B-LS960 (pipeline approach, uses LM) label-F1 (%) 79.8 #2 of 13 Archive leaderboard report
Named Entity Recognition (NER) SLUE W2V2-L-LL60K (e2e approach, uses LM) F1 (%) 64.8 #4 of 13 Archive leaderboard report
Named Entity Recognition (NER) SLUE W2V2-L-LL60K (e2e approach, uses LM) Text model N/A #4 of 13 Archive leaderboard report
Named Entity Recognition (NER) SLUE W2V2-L-LL60K (e2e approach, uses LM) label-F1 (%) 73.3 #4 of 13 Archive leaderboard report
Named Entity Recognition (NER) SLUE W2V2-B-LS960 (e2e approach, uses LM) F1 (%) 63.4 #5 of 13 Archive leaderboard report
Named Entity Recognition (NER) SLUE W2V2-B-LS960 (e2e approach, uses LM) Text model N/A #5 of 13 Archive leaderboard report
Named Entity Recognition (NER) SLUE W2V2-B-LS960 (e2e approach, uses LM) label-F1 (%) 71.7 #5 of 13 Archive leaderboard report
Named Entity Recognition (NER) SLUE HuBERT-B-LS960 (e2e approach, uses LM) F1 (%) 61.9 #6 of 13 Archive leaderboard report
Named Entity Recognition (NER) SLUE HuBERT-B-LS960 (e2e approach, uses LM) Text model N/A #6 of 13 Archive leaderboard report
Named Entity Recognition (NER) SLUE HuBERT-B-LS960 (e2e approach, uses LM) label-F1 (%) 70.3 #6 of 13 Archive leaderboard report
Named Entity Recognition (NER) SLUE W2V2-B-VP100K (e2e approach, uses LM) F1 (%) 61.8 #7 of 13 Archive leaderboard report
Named Entity Recognition (NER) SLUE W2V2-B-VP100K (e2e approach, uses LM) Text model N/A #7 of 13 Archive leaderboard report
Named Entity Recognition (NER) SLUE W2V2-B-VP100K (e2e approach, uses LM) label-F1 (%) 69.8 #7 of 13 Archive leaderboard report
Named Entity Recognition (NER) SLUE W2V2-L-LL60K (pipeline approach) F1 (%) 57.8 #8 of 13 Archive leaderboard report
Named Entity Recognition (NER) SLUE W2V2-L-LL60K (pipeline approach) Text model DeBERTa-L #8 of 13 Archive leaderboard report
Named Entity Recognition (NER) SLUE W2V2-L-LL60K (pipeline approach) label-F1 (%) 78.8 #8 of 13 Archive leaderboard report
Named Entity Recognition (NER) SLUE W2V2-L-LL60K (e2e approach) F1 (%) 50.9 #9 of 13 Archive leaderboard report
Named Entity Recognition (NER) SLUE W2V2-L-LL60K (e2e approach) Text model - #9 of 13 Archive leaderboard report
Named Entity Recognition (NER) SLUE W2V2-L-LL60K (e2e approach) label-F1 (%) 64.7 #9 of 13 Archive leaderboard report
Named Entity Recognition (NER) SLUE W2V2-B-LS960 (e2e approach) F1 (%) 50.2 #10 of 13 Archive leaderboard report
Named Entity Recognition (NER) SLUE W2V2-B-LS960 (e2e approach) Text model - #10 of 13 Archive leaderboard report
Named Entity Recognition (NER) SLUE W2V2-B-LS960 (e2e approach) label-F1 (%) 64.0 #10 of 13 Archive leaderboard report
Named Entity Recognition (NER) SLUE HuBERT-B-LS960 (e2e approach) F1 (%) 49.8 #11 of 13 Archive leaderboard report
Named Entity Recognition (NER) SLUE HuBERT-B-LS960 (e2e approach) Text model - #11 of 13 Archive leaderboard report
Named Entity Recognition (NER) SLUE HuBERT-B-LS960 (e2e approach) label-F1 (%) 62.9 #11 of 13 Archive leaderboard report
Named Entity Recognition (NER) SLUE W2V2-B-LS960 (pipeline approach) F1 (%) 49.5 #12 of 13 Archive leaderboard report
Named Entity Recognition (NER) SLUE W2V2-B-LS960 (pipeline approach) Text model DeBERTa-L #12 of 13 Archive leaderboard report
Named Entity Recognition (NER) SLUE W2V2-B-LS960 (pipeline approach) label-F1 (%) 74.2 #12 of 13 Archive leaderboard report
Named Entity Recognition (NER) SLUE W2V2-B-VP100K (e2e approach) F1 (%) 47.9 #13 of 13 Archive leaderboard report
Named Entity Recognition (NER) SLUE W2V2-B-VP100K (e2e approach) Text model - #13 of 13 Archive leaderboard report
Named Entity Recognition (NER) SLUE W2V2-B-VP100K (e2e approach) label-F1 (%) 60.8 #13 of 13 Archive leaderboard report
Sentiment Analysis SLUE W2V2-L-LL60K (pipeline approach, uses LM) F1 (%) 63.3 #1 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Sentiment Analysis SLUE W2V2-L-LL60K (pipeline approach, uses LM) Recall (%) 60.4 #1 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Sentiment Analysis SLUE W2V2-L-LL60K (pipeline approach, uses LM) Text model DeBERTa-L #1 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Sentiment Analysis SLUE W2V2-L-LL60K (pipeline approach) F1 (%) 63.3 #2 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Sentiment Analysis SLUE W2V2-L-LL60K (pipeline approach) Recall (%) 60.2 #2 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Sentiment Analysis SLUE W2V2-L-LL60K (pipeline approach) Text model DeBERTa-L #2 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Sentiment Analysis SLUE W2V2-B-LS960 (pipeline approach, uses LM) F1 (%) 62.9 #3 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Sentiment Analysis SLUE W2V2-B-LS960 (pipeline approach, uses LM) Recall (%) 60.0 #3 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Sentiment Analysis SLUE W2V2-B-LS960 (pipeline approach, uses LM) Text model DeBERTa-L #3 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Sentiment Analysis SLUE W2V2-B-LS960 (pipeline approach) F1 (%) 61.8 #4 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Sentiment Analysis SLUE W2V2-B-LS960 (pipeline approach) Recall (%) 59.0 #4 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Sentiment Analysis SLUE W2V2-B-LS960 (pipeline approach) Text model DeBERTa-L #4 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Sentiment Analysis SLUE W2V2-L-LL60K (e2e approach) F1 (%) 48.5 #5 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Sentiment Analysis SLUE W2V2-L-LL60K (e2e approach) Recall (%) 49.2 #5 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Sentiment Analysis SLUE W2V2-L-LL60K (e2e approach) Text model N/A #5 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Sentiment Analysis SLUE HuBERT-B-LS960 (e2e approach) F1 (%) 48.0 #6 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Sentiment Analysis SLUE HuBERT-B-LS960 (e2e approach) Recall (%) 47.5 #6 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Sentiment Analysis SLUE HuBERT-B-LS960 (e2e approach) Text model N/A #6 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Sentiment Analysis SLUE W2V2-B-LS960 (e2e approach) F1 (%) 46.6 #7 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Sentiment Analysis SLUE W2V2-B-LS960 (e2e approach) Recall (%) 46.0 #7 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Sentiment Analysis SLUE W2V2-B-LS960 (e2e approach) Text model N/A #7 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Sentiment Analysis SLUE W2V2-B-VP100K (e2e approach) F1 (%) 38.4 #8 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Sentiment Analysis SLUE W2V2-B-VP100K (e2e approach) Recall (%) 38.7 #8 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Sentiment Analysis SLUE W2V2-B-VP100K (e2e approach) Text model N/A #8 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Speech Recognition SLUE W2V2-L-LL60K (+ TED-LIUM 3 LM) VoxCeleb (Dev) 9.1 #1 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Speech Recognition SLUE W2V2-L-LL60K (+ TED-LIUM 3 LM) VoxCeleb (Test) 10.8 #1 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Speech Recognition SLUE W2V2-L-LL60K (+ TED-LIUM 3 LM) VoxPopuli (Dev) 9.1 #1 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Speech Recognition SLUE W2V2-L-LL60K (+ TED-LIUM 3 LM) VoxPopuli (Test) 9.3 #1 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Speech Recognition SLUE W2V2-B-LS960 (+ TED-LIUM 3 LM) VoxCeleb (Dev) 13.2 #2 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Speech Recognition SLUE W2V2-B-LS960 (+ TED-LIUM 3 LM) VoxCeleb (Test) 15.8 #2 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Speech Recognition SLUE W2V2-B-LS960 (+ TED-LIUM 3 LM) VoxPopuli (Dev) 12.0 #2 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Speech Recognition SLUE W2V2-B-LS960 (+ TED-LIUM 3 LM) VoxPopuli (Test) 12.2 #2 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Speech Recognition SLUE W2V2-L-LL60K (+ in-domain LM) VoxCeleb (Dev) 11.8 #3 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Speech Recognition SLUE W2V2-L-LL60K (+ in-domain LM) VoxCeleb (Test) 13.8 #3 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Speech Recognition SLUE W2V2-L-LL60K (+ in-domain LM) VoxPopuli (Dev) 12.0 #3 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Speech Recognition SLUE W2V2-L-LL60K (+ in-domain LM) VoxPopuli (Test) 12.5 #3 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Speech Recognition SLUE W2V2-L-LL60K VoxCeleb (Dev) 11.0 #4 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Speech Recognition SLUE W2V2-L-LL60K VoxCeleb (Test) 13.5 #4 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Speech Recognition SLUE W2V2-L-LL60K VoxPopuli (Dev) 14.0 #4 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Speech Recognition SLUE W2V2-L-LL60K VoxPopuli (Test) 12.1 #4 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Speech Recognition SLUE W2V2-B-LS960 (+ in-domain LM) VoxCeleb (Dev) 15.2 #5 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Speech Recognition SLUE W2V2-B-LS960 (+ in-domain LM) VoxCeleb (Test) 18.2 #5 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Speech Recognition SLUE W2V2-B-LS960 (+ in-domain LM) VoxPopuli (Dev) 14.6 #5 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Speech Recognition SLUE W2V2-B-LS960 (+ in-domain LM) VoxPopuli (Test) 15.2 #5 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Speech Recognition SLUE W2V2-B-LS960 VoxCeleb (Dev) 17.2 #6 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Speech Recognition SLUE W2V2-B-LS960 VoxCeleb (Test) 20.5 #6 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Speech Recognition SLUE W2V2-B-LS960 VoxPopuli (Dev) 17.2 #6 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Speech Recognition SLUE W2V2-B-LS960 VoxPopuli (Test) 17.9 #6 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Speech Recognition SLUE HuBERT-B-LS960 VoxCeleb (Dev) 19.6 #7 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Speech Recognition SLUE HuBERT-B-LS960 VoxCeleb (Test) 21.2 #7 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Speech Recognition SLUE HuBERT-B-LS960 VoxPopuli (Dev) 18.6 #7 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Speech Recognition SLUE HuBERT-B-LS960 VoxPopuli (Test) 19.1 #7 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Speech Recognition SLUE W2V2-B-VP100K VoxCeleb (Dev) 29.9 #8 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Speech Recognition SLUE W2V2-B-VP100K VoxCeleb (Test) 33.4 #8 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Speech Recognition SLUE W2V2-B-VP100K VoxPopuli (Dev) 21.6 #8 of 8 Archive leaderboard report
Speech Recognition SLUE W2V2-B-VP100K VoxPopuli (Test) 22.4 #8 of 8 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections