Papers › SLUE: New Benchmark Tasks for Spoken Language Understanding Evaluation on Natural Speech
SLUE: New Benchmark Tasks for Spoken Language Understanding Evaluation on Natural Speech
Suwon Shon, Ankita Pasad, Felix Wu, Pablo Brusco, Yoav Artzi, Karen Livescu, Kyu J. Han
Progress in speech processing has been facilitated by shared datasets and benchmarks. Historically these have focused on automatic speech recognition (ASR), speaker identification, or other lower-level tasks. Interest has been growing in higher-level spoken language understanding tasks, including using end-to-end models, but there are fewer annotated datasets for such tasks. At the same time, recent work shows the possibility of pre-training generic representations and then fine-tuning for several tasks using relatively little labeled data. We propose to create a suite of benchmark tasks for Spoken Language Understanding Evaluation (SLUE) consisting of limited-size labeled training sets and corresponding evaluation sets. This resource would allow the research community to track progress, evaluate pre-trained representations for higher-level tasks, and study open questions such as the utility of pipeline versus end-to-end approaches. We present the first phase of the SLUE benchmark suite, consisting of named entity recognition, sentiment analysis, and ASR on the corresponding datasets. We focus on naturally produced (not read or synthesized) speech, and freely available datasets. We provide new transcriptions and annotations on subsets of the VoxCeleb and VoxPopuli datasets, evaluation metrics and results for baseline models, and an open-source toolkit to reproduce the baselines and evaluate new models.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2111.10367")
Code
Syntology Ran 0 of 12 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 12 have no recorded run.
By repository: official repository: 12 samples from 1 repository, 0 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
12 samples harvested; 0 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 12 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 0 of the 12 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from asappresearch/slue-toolkit. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
0302aff920740fbc · report
3b9788e17612ec5c · report
c8831cc7145df3ab · report
7df2656f9761c553 · report
7f746dc6c2a62bb2 · report
656dc5c1fcd38ff8 · report
16afefff56a55570 · report
e29d3eb7f31a6d05 · report
5b6c17ce2ecdeb80 · report
400008f29f6e7364 · report
815aaded7a9eae16 · report
c6afd1a15980c103 · report
Tasks
Datasets
Introduced by this paper, per the archive.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Named Entity Recognition (NER) | SLUE | W2V2-L-LL60K (pipeline approach, uses LM) | F1 (%) | 69.6 | #1 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Named Entity Recognition (NER) | SLUE | W2V2-L-LL60K (pipeline approach, uses LM) | Text model | DeBERTa-L | #1 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Named Entity Recognition (NER) | SLUE | W2V2-L-LL60K (pipeline approach, uses LM) | label-F1 (%) | 82.2 | #1 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Named Entity Recognition (NER) | SLUE | W2V2-B-LS960 (pipeline approach, uses LM) | F1 (%) | 68.0 | #2 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Named Entity Recognition (NER) | SLUE | W2V2-B-LS960 (pipeline approach, uses LM) | Text model | DeBERTa-L | #2 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Named Entity Recognition (NER) | SLUE | W2V2-B-LS960 (pipeline approach, uses LM) | label-F1 (%) | 79.8 | #2 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Named Entity Recognition (NER) | SLUE | W2V2-L-LL60K (e2e approach, uses LM) | F1 (%) | 64.8 | #4 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Named Entity Recognition (NER) | SLUE | W2V2-L-LL60K (e2e approach, uses LM) | Text model | N/A | #4 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Named Entity Recognition (NER) | SLUE | W2V2-L-LL60K (e2e approach, uses LM) | label-F1 (%) | 73.3 | #4 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Named Entity Recognition (NER) | SLUE | W2V2-B-LS960 (e2e approach, uses LM) | F1 (%) | 63.4 | #5 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Named Entity Recognition (NER) | SLUE | W2V2-B-LS960 (e2e approach, uses LM) | Text model | N/A | #5 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Named Entity Recognition (NER) | SLUE | W2V2-B-LS960 (e2e approach, uses LM) | label-F1 (%) | 71.7 | #5 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Named Entity Recognition (NER) | SLUE | HuBERT-B-LS960 (e2e approach, uses LM) | F1 (%) | 61.9 | #6 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Named Entity Recognition (NER) | SLUE | HuBERT-B-LS960 (e2e approach, uses LM) | Text model | N/A | #6 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Named Entity Recognition (NER) | SLUE | HuBERT-B-LS960 (e2e approach, uses LM) | label-F1 (%) | 70.3 | #6 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Named Entity Recognition (NER) | SLUE | W2V2-B-VP100K (e2e approach, uses LM) | F1 (%) | 61.8 | #7 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Named Entity Recognition (NER) | SLUE | W2V2-B-VP100K (e2e approach, uses LM) | Text model | N/A | #7 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Named Entity Recognition (NER) | SLUE | W2V2-B-VP100K (e2e approach, uses LM) | label-F1 (%) | 69.8 | #7 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Named Entity Recognition (NER) | SLUE | W2V2-L-LL60K (pipeline approach) | F1 (%) | 57.8 | #8 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Named Entity Recognition (NER) | SLUE | W2V2-L-LL60K (pipeline approach) | Text model | DeBERTa-L | #8 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Named Entity Recognition (NER) | SLUE | W2V2-L-LL60K (pipeline approach) | label-F1 (%) | 78.8 | #8 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Named Entity Recognition (NER) | SLUE | W2V2-L-LL60K (e2e approach) | F1 (%) | 50.9 | #9 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Named Entity Recognition (NER) | SLUE | W2V2-L-LL60K (e2e approach) | Text model | - | #9 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Named Entity Recognition (NER) | SLUE | W2V2-L-LL60K (e2e approach) | label-F1 (%) | 64.7 | #9 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Named Entity Recognition (NER) | SLUE | W2V2-B-LS960 (e2e approach) | F1 (%) | 50.2 | #10 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Named Entity Recognition (NER) | SLUE | W2V2-B-LS960 (e2e approach) | Text model | - | #10 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Named Entity Recognition (NER) | SLUE | W2V2-B-LS960 (e2e approach) | label-F1 (%) | 64.0 | #10 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Named Entity Recognition (NER) | SLUE | HuBERT-B-LS960 (e2e approach) | F1 (%) | 49.8 | #11 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Named Entity Recognition (NER) | SLUE | HuBERT-B-LS960 (e2e approach) | Text model | - | #11 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Named Entity Recognition (NER) | SLUE | HuBERT-B-LS960 (e2e approach) | label-F1 (%) | 62.9 | #11 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Named Entity Recognition (NER) | SLUE | W2V2-B-LS960 (pipeline approach) | F1 (%) | 49.5 | #12 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Named Entity Recognition (NER) | SLUE | W2V2-B-LS960 (pipeline approach) | Text model | DeBERTa-L | #12 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Named Entity Recognition (NER) | SLUE | W2V2-B-LS960 (pipeline approach) | label-F1 (%) | 74.2 | #12 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Named Entity Recognition (NER) | SLUE | W2V2-B-VP100K (e2e approach) | F1 (%) | 47.9 | #13 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Named Entity Recognition (NER) | SLUE | W2V2-B-VP100K (e2e approach) | Text model | - | #13 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Named Entity Recognition (NER) | SLUE | W2V2-B-VP100K (e2e approach) | label-F1 (%) | 60.8 | #13 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Sentiment Analysis | SLUE | W2V2-L-LL60K (pipeline approach, uses LM) | F1 (%) | 63.3 | #1 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Sentiment Analysis | SLUE | W2V2-L-LL60K (pipeline approach, uses LM) | Recall (%) | 60.4 | #1 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Sentiment Analysis | SLUE | W2V2-L-LL60K (pipeline approach, uses LM) | Text model | DeBERTa-L | #1 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Sentiment Analysis | SLUE | W2V2-L-LL60K (pipeline approach) | F1 (%) | 63.3 | #2 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Sentiment Analysis | SLUE | W2V2-L-LL60K (pipeline approach) | Recall (%) | 60.2 | #2 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Sentiment Analysis | SLUE | W2V2-L-LL60K (pipeline approach) | Text model | DeBERTa-L | #2 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Sentiment Analysis | SLUE | W2V2-B-LS960 (pipeline approach, uses LM) | F1 (%) | 62.9 | #3 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Sentiment Analysis | SLUE | W2V2-B-LS960 (pipeline approach, uses LM) | Recall (%) | 60.0 | #3 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Sentiment Analysis | SLUE | W2V2-B-LS960 (pipeline approach, uses LM) | Text model | DeBERTa-L | #3 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Sentiment Analysis | SLUE | W2V2-B-LS960 (pipeline approach) | F1 (%) | 61.8 | #4 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Sentiment Analysis | SLUE | W2V2-B-LS960 (pipeline approach) | Recall (%) | 59.0 | #4 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Sentiment Analysis | SLUE | W2V2-B-LS960 (pipeline approach) | Text model | DeBERTa-L | #4 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Sentiment Analysis | SLUE | W2V2-L-LL60K (e2e approach) | F1 (%) | 48.5 | #5 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Sentiment Analysis | SLUE | W2V2-L-LL60K (e2e approach) | Recall (%) | 49.2 | #5 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Sentiment Analysis | SLUE | W2V2-L-LL60K (e2e approach) | Text model | N/A | #5 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Sentiment Analysis | SLUE | HuBERT-B-LS960 (e2e approach) | F1 (%) | 48.0 | #6 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Sentiment Analysis | SLUE | HuBERT-B-LS960 (e2e approach) | Recall (%) | 47.5 | #6 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Sentiment Analysis | SLUE | HuBERT-B-LS960 (e2e approach) | Text model | N/A | #6 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Sentiment Analysis | SLUE | W2V2-B-LS960 (e2e approach) | F1 (%) | 46.6 | #7 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Sentiment Analysis | SLUE | W2V2-B-LS960 (e2e approach) | Recall (%) | 46.0 | #7 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Sentiment Analysis | SLUE | W2V2-B-LS960 (e2e approach) | Text model | N/A | #7 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Sentiment Analysis | SLUE | W2V2-B-VP100K (e2e approach) | F1 (%) | 38.4 | #8 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Sentiment Analysis | SLUE | W2V2-B-VP100K (e2e approach) | Recall (%) | 38.7 | #8 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Sentiment Analysis | SLUE | W2V2-B-VP100K (e2e approach) | Text model | N/A | #8 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Speech Recognition | SLUE | W2V2-L-LL60K (+ TED-LIUM 3 LM) | VoxCeleb (Dev) | 9.1 | #1 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Speech Recognition | SLUE | W2V2-L-LL60K (+ TED-LIUM 3 LM) | VoxCeleb (Test) | 10.8 | #1 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Speech Recognition | SLUE | W2V2-L-LL60K (+ TED-LIUM 3 LM) | VoxPopuli (Dev) | 9.1 | #1 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Speech Recognition | SLUE | W2V2-L-LL60K (+ TED-LIUM 3 LM) | VoxPopuli (Test) | 9.3 | #1 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Speech Recognition | SLUE | W2V2-B-LS960 (+ TED-LIUM 3 LM) | VoxCeleb (Dev) | 13.2 | #2 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Speech Recognition | SLUE | W2V2-B-LS960 (+ TED-LIUM 3 LM) | VoxCeleb (Test) | 15.8 | #2 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Speech Recognition | SLUE | W2V2-B-LS960 (+ TED-LIUM 3 LM) | VoxPopuli (Dev) | 12.0 | #2 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Speech Recognition | SLUE | W2V2-B-LS960 (+ TED-LIUM 3 LM) | VoxPopuli (Test) | 12.2 | #2 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Speech Recognition | SLUE | W2V2-L-LL60K (+ in-domain LM) | VoxCeleb (Dev) | 11.8 | #3 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Speech Recognition | SLUE | W2V2-L-LL60K (+ in-domain LM) | VoxCeleb (Test) | 13.8 | #3 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Speech Recognition | SLUE | W2V2-L-LL60K (+ in-domain LM) | VoxPopuli (Dev) | 12.0 | #3 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Speech Recognition | SLUE | W2V2-L-LL60K (+ in-domain LM) | VoxPopuli (Test) | 12.5 | #3 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Speech Recognition | SLUE | W2V2-L-LL60K | VoxCeleb (Dev) | 11.0 | #4 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Speech Recognition | SLUE | W2V2-L-LL60K | VoxCeleb (Test) | 13.5 | #4 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Speech Recognition | SLUE | W2V2-L-LL60K | VoxPopuli (Dev) | 14.0 | #4 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Speech Recognition | SLUE | W2V2-L-LL60K | VoxPopuli (Test) | 12.1 | #4 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Speech Recognition | SLUE | W2V2-B-LS960 (+ in-domain LM) | VoxCeleb (Dev) | 15.2 | #5 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Speech Recognition | SLUE | W2V2-B-LS960 (+ in-domain LM) | VoxCeleb (Test) | 18.2 | #5 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Speech Recognition | SLUE | W2V2-B-LS960 (+ in-domain LM) | VoxPopuli (Dev) | 14.6 | #5 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Speech Recognition | SLUE | W2V2-B-LS960 (+ in-domain LM) | VoxPopuli (Test) | 15.2 | #5 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Speech Recognition | SLUE | W2V2-B-LS960 | VoxCeleb (Dev) | 17.2 | #6 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Speech Recognition | SLUE | W2V2-B-LS960 | VoxCeleb (Test) | 20.5 | #6 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Speech Recognition | SLUE | W2V2-B-LS960 | VoxPopuli (Dev) | 17.2 | #6 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Speech Recognition | SLUE | W2V2-B-LS960 | VoxPopuli (Test) | 17.9 | #6 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Speech Recognition | SLUE | HuBERT-B-LS960 | VoxCeleb (Dev) | 19.6 | #7 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Speech Recognition | SLUE | HuBERT-B-LS960 | VoxCeleb (Test) | 21.2 | #7 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Speech Recognition | SLUE | HuBERT-B-LS960 | VoxPopuli (Dev) | 18.6 | #7 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Speech Recognition | SLUE | HuBERT-B-LS960 | VoxPopuli (Test) | 19.1 | #7 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Speech Recognition | SLUE | W2V2-B-VP100K | VoxCeleb (Dev) | 29.9 | #8 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Speech Recognition | SLUE | W2V2-B-VP100K | VoxCeleb (Test) | 33.4 | #8 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Speech Recognition | SLUE | W2V2-B-VP100K | VoxPopuli (Dev) | 21.6 | #8 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Speech Recognition | SLUE | W2V2-B-VP100K | VoxPopuli (Test) | 22.4 | #8 of 8 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections